zhenzhubay.com

珍珠湾全球网

 找回密码
 用户注册

tag 标签: 律师

相关帖子

版块 作者 回复/查看 最后发表

没有相关内容

相关日志

分享 哈佛法学教授拨冗指正 LAO律师 HOLDING 概念错误
热度 2 岳东晓 2016-3-4 03:20
一个案子, Worcester v. Gerogia ,我指出其 holding 是【 印第安人有一定的自主权、不容州政府侵犯。。。 这个案子的更为广泛的holding是其关于印第安部落自主权不容州侵犯及其与联邦的关系的法律结论。以后乔治亚或者其他州制订新的企图管辖印第安部落的法律,按照这个 holding, 这些新法律也是无效的、违宪的。】我还举了好几个后续案例说明这一点(后续案例引用用 held 一词)。而且根据HOLDING的定义做了分析。 对此,LAO 律师写了一篇长文,说《 揭示岳东晓博士对1832年传道士案论述的谬误(2) 》。LAO说这个案子的 holding是【 传教士案件判决法 (holding): Georgia 要求白人申请在切诺基部落居住执照法律违宪无效。 (“The act of the state of Georgia, under which the plaintiff in error was prosecuted, is consequently void, and the judgment a nullity.” 】 LAO还称:【 其他和判决和判决法不相关的都是 论证语 (dictum), 没有任何判决执行法律性 , 不构成任何先例法律性,高级法院后来的案例中称这是法官 Marshall 的陈述,或者观点, 包括最著名的 “ 切诺基部落国是个独特的群体,有自己的领地和邦界, 州政府对部落国的法律无法律效力。】 读懂案例,明白哪些是 HOLDING 对于律师来说是最基本的能力。因为 HOLDING 才是有法律效力的。诉讼中如果分不清HOLDING,等于盲人夜行。 但我再怎么说,读者还是疑惑。为此,我昨天给哈佛大学法学院一位教授(他写过关于印第安人的这些案例的评论)发了个EMAIL,特意请教 WORCESTER案的HOLDING是什么。他今天回答到: 翻译如下:其基本的HOLDING是乔治亚的法律不能延伸到切诺基部落国,因为关系是部落-联邦,而不是部落-州。 教授的姓名我就不写了(尚未征求其许可),如果有兴趣的,可以去问问其他法学教授。 下面是若干法院谈到WORCESTER案的HOLDING时的说法: Blatchford v. Native Village of Noatak, 501 US 775 (1991) Illustrative of this principle are our cases holding that the law of the State is generally inapplicable to Native American affairs, absent the consent of Congress. See, e. g., Worcester v. Georgia, 6 Pet. 515 (1832). Chief Justice Marshall explained for the Court in Worcester that a federally recognized tribe quot;is a distinct community, occupying its own territory, with boundaries accurately described, in which the laws of can have no force, and which the citizens of have no right to enter, but with the assent of the themselves, or in conformity with treaties, and with the acts of Congress. The whole intercourse between the United States and this nation, is, by our Constitution and laws, vested in the government of the United States.quot; Id., at 561. United States v. Kagama, 118 US 375(1886) In the case of Worcester v. The State of Georgia, above cited, it was held that, though the Indians had by treaty sold their land within that State, and agreed to remove away, which they had failed to do, the State could not, while they remained on those lands, extend its laws, criminal and civil, over the tribes; that the duty and power to compel their removal was in the United States, and the tribe was under their protection, and could not be subjected to the laws of the State and the process of its courts. In re Colwash, 356 P. 2d 994 - Wash: Supreme Court 1960 I shall not repeat here what I there said concerning theconstitutional basis of that power, or the holding in Worcester v. Georgia (1832), 31 U.S. 515, 8 L.Ed. 483, where Chief Justice Marshall stated the source of that power in two sentences (p. 559): quot;That instrument confers on congress the powers of war and peace; of making treaties, and of regulating commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes. These powers comprehend all that is required for the regulation of our intercourse with the Indians....quot; Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wis. v. State of Wis., 518 F. Supp. 712 In a case holding that the State of Georgia could not enforce its laws on the Cherokee Reservation, which was within the external boundaries of the state, the Supreme Court held: The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community, occupying its own territory, with boundaries accurately described, in which the laws of Georgia can have no force... The whole intercourse between the United States and this nation is, by our Constitution and laws, vested in the government of the United States. Worcester v. State of Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515, 561, 8 L.Ed. 483 (1832). Nevada v. Hicks, 533 US 353 Our holding in Worcester must be considered in light of the fact that quot; he 1828 treaty with the Cherokee Nation . . . guaranteed the Indians their lands would never be subjected to the jurisdiction of any State or Territory.quot; Organized Village of Kake v. Egan, 369 U. S. 60, 71 (1962); cf. Williams v. Lee, 358 U. S., at 221-222 (comparing Navajo treaty to the Cherokee treaty in Worcester ). http://sct.narf.org/articles/supreme_court_indian_problem_fletcher_2007.pdf The final piece of the Trilogy is Worcester, where Chief Justice Marshall’s opinion garnered a 5-1 majority holding that the laws of the State of Georgia do not extend into Indian Country where they conflict with federal laws or Indian treaties.
个人分类: 法律|10278 次阅读|2 个评论
分享 桑兰案被告律师莫虎退出
热度 2 岳东晓 2016-3-3 13:03
刚看了一下桑兰案案卷,发现案子复活了。有下面几个新的变化。 1)被告KS LIU与 GINA LIU 换了律师,莫虎被 terminated, 换成了 Dealy Silberstein Braverman , LLP 的几个律师。这个律师事务所总共有7名律师。根据其介绍,主要是从事雇佣关系、遗产信托等领域的诉讼。桑兰案主打律师徐也在要求退出。桑兰的新律师来自Schiller Law Group PC, Orans, Elsen, Lupert Brown LLP 等(洋人)。在雇佣“洋枪队”方面,桑兰走在被告之前。不过,之前海明造成的损伤恐怕是无法逆转了 -- 尽管在桑兰对海明的战役中,海明最终屈服。 2)主审法官采纳了副法官之前就 Rule 37 (取证违规)对原告作出的处罚。这个事件之前有介绍的。早在2015年2月,副法官裁决判罚原告桑兰,原因是桑兰未能如约接受录口供。本来这个事情副法官说了就可以算数的(因为这不属于 dispositive 动议),但桑兰请求主审法官重新考虑。这一考虑,加上中间的一些变故,竟然拖到了一年后的今天。 此案过去很长时间在美国联邦法庭这样严肃庄重的场所上互掷泥巴相攻,极大地损害了纽约华人的形象。 希望新人新气象。 U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:11-cv-02870-AT-JCF Lan v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al Assigned to: Judge Analisa Torres Referred to: Magistrate Judge James C. Francis Demand: $9,999,000 Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act Date Filed: 04/28/2011 Jury Demand: Both Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: Federal Question Plaintiff Sang Lan representedby X. Bing Xu The Bing Law Firm 5705 Hansel Ave. Orlando, FL 32809 (407) 851-1000 Fax: (407)-851-1008 Email: bing@binglawfirm.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Allan Steven Schiller Schiller Law Group PC 130 West 42nd Street New York, NY 10036 718)-268-9800 Fax: 718)-268-9892 Email: as@asfirm.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Brian Patrick Fredericks Law Office of Brian P. Fredericks, PC 39-07 Prince St., 6E Flushing, NY 11354 (718) 889-6188 Fax: (718) 353-7188 Email: brian@frederickslawpc.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED John Vincent Golaszewski Orans, Elsen, Lupert Brown LLP 875 Third Avenue, 28th Flr. New York, NY 10020 (212) 586-2211 Fax: (212) 765-3662 Email: jvgolaszewski@gmail.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Ming Hai Law Office of Ming Hai 36-09 Main Street, Ste. 7B Flushing, NY 11354 718 445 9111 Fax: 718 445 5424 Email: lawminghai@yahoo.com TERMINATED: 10/31/2011 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED V. Movant former attorney Ming Hai former attorney for plaintiff TERMINATED: 11/20/2012 representedby Ming Hai (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED V. Defendant AOL Time Warner, Inc. TERMINATED: 06/29/2011 Defendant The United States Gymnastics Federation TERMINATED: 07/13/2011 doing business as USA Gymnastics TERMINATED: 07/13/2011 Defendant TIG Insurance Company TERMINATED: 07/13/2011 Defendant TIG Specialty Insurance Solutions TERMINATED: 07/13/2011 Defendant Riverstone Claims Management, LLC TERMINATED: 07/13/2011 Defendant Ted Turner TERMINATED: 11/20/2012 Defendant Wilson Xue TERMINATED: 06/17/2011 representedby Hugh Hu Mo The Law Firm of Hugh H. Mo, P.C. 225 Broadway, Suite 2702 New York, NY 10007 (212) 385-1500 Fax: (212) 385-1870 Email: hhmo8@verizon.net ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Defendant Hugh Mo TERMINATED: 11/20/2012 representedby Hugh Hu Mo (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Defendant John Does and Jane Does #1 through 15, Inclusive TERMINATED: 11/20/2012 Defendant Winston Sie TERMINATED: 06/28/2011 representedby Hugh Hu Mo (See above for address) Defendant Time Warner, Inc. TERMINATED: 02/25/2014 representedby James Andrew Lamberth Troutman Sanders LLP Suite 5200, 600 Peachtree Street, N.E. Atlanta, GA 30308 (404)-885-3362 Fax: (404)-885-3900 Email: james.lamberth@troutmansanders.com LEAD ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Alan William Bakowski Troutman Sanders LLP 600 Peachtree Street N.E., Suite 5200 Atlanta, US 30308 (404)-885-3000 Fax: (404)-962-3900 Email: alan.bakowski@troutmansanders.com PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Defendant Keo-Sung Liu also known as Hui-Hung Sie representedby Milo Silberstein Dealy Silberstein Braverman, LLP 225 Broadway, Suite 1405 New York, NY 10007 (212) 385-0066 Fax: (212) 385-2117 Email: msilberstein@dsblawny.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Hugh Hu Mo (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/27/2016 Maria Louisa Bianco Dealy Silberstein Braverman, LLP 225 Broadway, Suite 1405 New York, NY 10007 (212)-385-0066 Email: mbianco@dsblawny.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Pedro Medina , Jr The Law Firm of Hugh H. Mo, P.C. 225 Broadway, Suite 2702 New York, NY 10007 212-385-1500 Fax: 212-385-1500 Email: pemedina@verizon.net TERMINATED: 01/27/2016 Defendant Gina Hiu-Hung Liu individually also known as Hui-Hung Sie also known as Gina Liu representedby Milo Silberstein (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Hugh Hu Mo (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/27/2016 Maria Louisa Bianco (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Pedro Medina , Jr (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/27/2016 Defendant Gina Hiu-Hung Liu as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund also known as Hui-Hung Sie also known as Gina Liu representedby Milo Silberstein (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Hugh Hu Mo (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/27/2016 Maria Louisa Bianco (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Pedro Medina , Jr (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/27/2016 Defendant Hugh Hu Mo representedby Hugh Hu Mo (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Pedro Medina , Jr (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Defendant Does 1-30 unknown defendants, jointly and severally Date Filed # Docket Text 04/28/2011 1 COMPLAINT against AOL Time Warner, Inc., K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, K.S. Liu, Riverstone Claims Management, LLC, TIG Insurance Company, TIG Specialty Insurance Solutions, The United States Gymnastics Federation, Ted Turner. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 465401005294)Document filed by Sang Lan.(rdz) (nd). (Entered: 05/02/2011) 04/28/2011 SUMMONS ISSUED as to All Defendants. (rdz) (Entered: 05/02/2011) 04/28/2011 Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV is so designated. (rdz) (Entered: 05/02/2011) 04/28/2011 Case Designated ECF. (rdz) (Entered: 05/02/2011) 05/13/2011 2 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING FOR NON-ECF DOCUMENT - MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 amended verified complaint)(Hai, Ming) Modified on 5/16/2011 (db). (Entered: 05/13/2011) 05/13/2011 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY THAT THE ATTEMPTED FILING OF Document No. 2 HAS BEEN REJECTED. Note to Attorney Ming Hai : THE CLERK'S OFFICE DOES NOT ACCEPT LETTERS FOR FILING, either through ECF or otherwise, except where the judge has ordered that a particular letter be docketed. Letters may be sent directly to a judge. (db) (Entered: 05/16/2011) 05/13/2011 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT amending 1 Complaint, against AOL Time Warner, Inc., K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, K.S. Liu, Riverstone Claims Management, LLC, TIG Insurance Company, TIG Specialty Insurance Solutions, The United States Gymnastics Federation, Ted Turner, Wilson Xue, Hugh Mo, John Does and Jane Does #1 through 15, Inclusive with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Sang Lan. Related document: 1 Complaint, filed by Sang Lan.(cd) (nd). (Entered: 05/17/2011) 05/17/2011 3 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Leonard B. Sand. Judge Thomas P. Griesa is no longer assigned to the case. (sjo) (Entered: 05/17/2011) 05/20/2011 5 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Ted Turner. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Hai, Ming) Modified on 5/23/2011 (dt). (Entered: 05/20/2011) 05/20/2011 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Amended Complaint,. Hugh Mo served on 5/20/2011, answer due 6/10/2011. Service was accepted by Hugh Mo. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Hai, Ming) (Entered: 05/20/2011) 05/23/2011 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY - DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL. Note to Attorney Ming Hai Document 5 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was referred to Judge Leonard B. Sand for approval. (dt) (Entered: 05/23/2011) 05/24/2011 7 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISCONTINUANCE AS AGAINST TED TURNER, the plaintiff, through her attorney, hereby voluntarily discontinues any and all claims/cause of actions as against Ted Turner in this action with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 5/24/11) (pl) (Entered: 05/24/2011) 05/27/2011 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Hugh Hu Mo on behalf of Hugh Mo (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 05/27/2011) 06/02/2011 9 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 6/2/2011) (jpo) (Entered: 06/02/2011) 06/02/2011 10 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Leonard B. Sand from Hugh H. Mo dated 5/27/11 re: Counsel requests that Your Honor grant application to extend the undersigned parties' time to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's Amended Complaint until 60 days after plaintiff also serves her Amended Complaint upon the Liu's. ENDORSEMENT: Defendant Mo's time to answer or move with respect to the amended complaint is extended to July 15, 2011, Hugh Mo answer due 7/15/2011. (Motions due by 7/15/2011.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 6/2/11) (djc) (Entered: 06/02/2011) 06/06/2011 11 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Amended Complaint,. Riverstone Claims Management, LLC served on 6/6/2011, answer due 6/27/2011. Service was accepted by Axia Flores. Service was made by Mail, too. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Hai, Ming) (Entered: 06/06/2011) 06/06/2011 12 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Amended Complaint,. TIG Insurance Company served on 6/6/2011, answer due 6/27/2011. Service was accepted by Axia Flores. Service was made by Mail, too. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Hai, Ming) (Entered: 06/06/2011) 06/06/2011 13 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Amended Complaint,. TIG Specialty Insurance Solutions served on 6/6/2011, answer due 6/27/2011. Service was accepted by Aixa Flores. Service was made by Mail, too. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Hai, Ming) (Entered: 06/06/2011) 06/06/2011 14 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Amended Complaint,. Service was made by certified mail for additional service. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Hai, Ming) (Entered: 06/06/2011) 06/06/2011 15 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Amended Complaint,. Service was made by certified mail for additional service. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Hai, Ming) (Entered: 06/06/2011) 06/08/2011 16 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - FIRST MOTION to Amend/Correct Amended Complaint . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit attorney declaration, # 2 2nd amended complaint, # 3 Affidavit affidavit of service of motion)(Hai, Ming) Modified on 6/9/2011 (ldi). (Entered: 06/08/2011) 06/08/2011 17 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - FIRST MOTION to Amend/Correct Amended Complaint . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit attorney declaration, # 2 2nd Amended Complaint, # 3 Affidavit Exhibit A: affidavit by Ping Lu, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit B: statement by Gina Liu, # 5 Affidavit Affidavit of Service of motion papers)(Hai, Ming) Modified on 6/9/2011 (ldi). (Entered: 06/08/2011) 06/08/2011 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Note to Attorney Ming Hai to RE-FILE Document 17 FIRST MOTION to Amend/Correct Amended Complaint . ERROR(S): Supporting documents must be filed separately, each receiving their own document number. Declaration in Support of Motion is found under the event list Replies, Opposition and Supporting Documents. NOTE: Only re-file one motion, and declaration with attachments. (ldi) (Entered: 06/09/2011) 06/09/2011 18 FIRST MOTION to Amend/Correct Amended Complaint . Document filed by Sang Lan.(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 06/09/2011) 06/09/2011 19 AFFIRMATION of Ming Hai in Support re: 18 FIRST MOTION to Amend/Correct Amended Complaint .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 2nd Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit Ping Lu Affidavit, # 3 Exhibit Gina Liu Statement, # 4 Affidavit Affidavit of Service of Motion Papers)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 06/09/2011) 06/14/2011 20 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING FOR NON-ECF DOCUMENT - RESPONSE to Motion re: 18 FIRST MOTION to Amend/Correct Amended Complaint . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Opposing counsel Hugh Mo's response)(Hai, Ming) Modified on 6/14/2011 (ldi). (Entered: 06/14/2011) 06/14/2011 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY THAT THE ATTEMPTED FILING OF Document No. 20 HAS BEEN REJECTED. Note to Attorney Ming Hai : THE CLERK'S OFFICE DOES NOT ACCEPT LETTERS FOR FILING, either through ECF or otherwise, except where the judge has ordered that a particular letter be docketed. Letters may be sent directly to a judge. (ldi) (Entered: 06/14/2011) 06/15/2011 21 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Ming Hai dated 6/14/2011 re: Counsel for the Plaintiff writes to inform the Court that opposing counsel will not be opposing the Plaintiff's motion to amended the amended complaint. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiffs' motion to amend (Docket no. 18) is granted as unopposed. Plaintiff shall promptly serve and file the Amended Complaint. Judges initials are to appear on ALL papers submitted to this Court. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 6/14/2011) (ab) (Entered: 06/15/2011) 06/16/2011 22 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Amended Complaint,. K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung served on 6/6/2011, answer due 6/27/2011. Service was made by Posted to the door and mail. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Hai, Ming) (Entered: 06/16/2011) 06/16/2011 23 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Amended Complaint,. K.S. Liu served on 6/6/2011, answer due 6/27/2011. Service was made by fix and mail. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Hai, Ming) (Entered: 06/16/2011) 06/16/2011 24 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Amended Complaint,. Wilson Xue served on 6/6/2011, answer due 6/27/2011. Service was made by fix and mail. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Hai, Ming) (Entered: 06/16/2011) 06/16/2011 25 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Hugh Hu Mo on behalf of K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 06/16/2011) 06/16/2011 26 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Hugh Hu Mo on behalf of K.S. Liu (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 06/16/2011) 06/16/2011 27 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Hugh Hu Mo on behalf of Wilson Xue (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 06/16/2011) 06/17/2011 32 AMENDED COMPLAINT against AOL Time Warner, Inc., John Does and Jane Does #1 through 15, Inclusive, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo, Riverstone Claims Management, LLC, Winston Sie, TIG Insurance Company, TIG Specialty Insurance Solutions, The United States Gymnastics Federation, Ted Turner with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Sang Lan. (ft) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/7/2014: # 1 Exhibit) (nd). (Entered: 06/20/2011) 06/17/2011 SUMMONS ISSUED as to AOL Time Warner, Inc., John Does and Jane Does #1 through 15, Inclusive, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo, Riverstone Claims Management, LLC, Winston Sie, TIG Insurance Company, TIG Specialty Insurance Solutions, The United States Gymnastics Federation, Ted Turner. (ft) (Entered: 06/20/2011) 06/19/2011 28 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) . Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo, Wilson Xue.(Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 06/19/2011) 06/19/2011 29 DECLARATION of Franklin K. Chiu in Support re: 28 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) .. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo, Wilson Xue. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I)(Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 06/19/2011) 06/19/2011 30 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 28 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) .. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo, Wilson Xue. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 06/19/2011) 06/19/2011 31 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Motion to Dismiss, Declaration in Support, Exhibits and Memorandum of Law in Support served on Plaintiff Sang Lan on 06/19/2011. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo, Wilson Xue. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 06/19/2011) 06/23/2011 33 STIPULATION AND ORDER, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned counsel, that the time for defendants TIG Insurance Company, TIG Specialty Insurance Solutions and SilverStone Claims Management, LLC, to answer, move or otherwise respond to plaintiff's Summons and Second Amended Complaint in this action, be and the same hereby is extended to and including July 29, 2011. Defendants consent to the Jurisdiction of the Court. (Riverstone Claims Management, LLC answer due 7/29/2011; TIG Insurance Company answer due 7/29/2011; TIG Specialty Insurance Solutions answer due 7/29/2011).( Motions due by 7/29/2011.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 6/23/11) (djc) (Entered: 06/23/2011) 06/24/2011 34 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo, Winston Sie, Wilson Xue.(Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 06/24/2011) 06/24/2011 35 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 34 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo, Winston Sie, Wilson Xue. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 06/24/2011) 06/24/2011 36 DECLARATION of Franklin K. Chiu, Esq. in Support re: 34 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo, Winston Sie, Wilson Xue. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 06/24/2011) 06/24/2011 37 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Motion to Dismiss Action FRCP 12(b)(1), Memorandum of Law, Declaration and Exhibits served on Plaintiff Sang lan on 06/24/2011. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo, Winston Sie, Wilson Xue. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 06/24/2011) 06/27/2011 38 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING FOR NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Winston Sie. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Hai, Ming) Modified on 6/28/2011 (dt). (Entered: 06/27/2011) 06/28/2011 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO E-MAIL PDF. Note to Attorney Ming Hai for noncompliance with Section (18.4) of the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules Instructions. E-MAIL the PDF for Document 38 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, to: judgments@nysd.uscourts.gov. (dt) (Entered: 06/28/2011) 06/28/2011 39 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) AOL Time Warner, Inc.. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Hai, Ming) Modified on 6/29/2011 (ml). (Entered: 06/28/2011) 06/28/2011 40 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISCONTINUANCE AGAINST WINSTON SIE: Please take notice that the plaintiff, through her attorney, hereby voluntarily discontinues this action against Winston Sie without prejudice, on the ground that Sie's counsel Hugh Mo has provided new evidences indicating that Winston Sie has been living in a foreign country since February, 2002. This Notice has been served on Hugh Mo via ECF and mail on the date below by the undersigned. ENDORSEMENT: So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 6/28/2011) (mbe) (Entered: 06/28/2011) 06/29/2011 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY - DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL. Note to Attorney Ming Hai Document 39 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was referred to Judge Leonard B. Sand for approval. (ml) (Entered: 06/29/2011) 06/29/2011 41 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed without prejudice against the defendant(s) AOL Time Warner, Inc.. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 6/29/2011) (jpo) (Entered: 06/29/2011) 07/06/2011 42 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated 6/28/11 re: Defendants respectfully submit that this Court should deny Attorney Hai's request for an extension of time to cure the deficiencies of Plaintiff's Action as referenced in Defendants' Rule 11 Motion, because it is an independent application that does not rely upon the outcome of Defendants' two pending Motions to Dismiss under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). ENDORSEMENT: As no Rule 11 motion is currently pending, there is no deadline to be extended. So ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 7/6/11) (rjm) (Entered: 07/06/2011) 07/06/2011 43 SECOND MOTION to Amend/Correct 32 Amended Complaint,. Document filed by Sang Lan.(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 07/06/2011) 07/06/2011 44 DECLARATION of Ming Hai in Support re: 43 SECOND MOTION to Amend/Correct 32 Amended Complaint,.. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 amended complaint, # 2 Exhibit A, affidavit of Ping Lu, # 3 Exhibit B, statement of Gina Liu, # 4 Exhibit C, commercials by using Sang Lan's image, etc., # 5 Affidavit of service of Motion with supporting documents)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 07/06/2011) 07/08/2011 45 ENDORSED LETTER: addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis from Hugh H. Mo dated 7/8/2011 re: Plaintiff has recently filed a Second Motion to Amend Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, and the parties have agreed to a briefing schedule that defendants will submit opposition to said Motion by July 29, 2011, and Plaintiff's reply by August 12. 2011. ENDORSEMENT: So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 7/8/11) (js) (Entered: 07/08/2011) 07/11/2011 46 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Leonard B. Sand from Hugh H. Mo dated 6/30/11 re: Defendants have filed two Motions to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 12(b)(1), on June 19 and 24, 2011, Docket Entries #28 and #34, respectively. We have conferred with plaintiff's counsel regarding a joint briefing schedule for both of these motions, and have reached an agreement on consent that: Plaintiff's answering papers to both motions must be served on or before July 25, 2011; and, Defendants' reply papers as to both motions must be served on or before August 5, 2011. ENDORSEMENT: Oral argument will be scheduled upon resolution of motion to amend. So ordered (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 7/6/11) (djc) (Entered: 07/11/2011) 07/12/2011 47 MOTION for Sanctions against Plaintiff Sang Lan and her attorney Ming Hai, Esq . Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo, Winston Sie, Wilson Xue.(Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 07/12/2011) 07/12/2011 48 DECLARATION of Franklin K. Chiu, Esq. in Support re: 47 MOTION for Sanctions against Plaintiff Sang Lan and her attorney Ming Hai, Esq .. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo, Winston Sie, Wilson Xue. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 07/12/2011) 07/12/2011 49 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 47 MOTION for Sanctions against Plaintiff Sang Lan and her attorney Ming Hai, Esq .. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo, Winston Sie, Wilson Xue. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 07/12/2011) 07/12/2011 50 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Motion for Sanctions, Memorandum of Law in Support, Declaration of Franklin K. Chiu, and exhibits annexed thereto served on Plaintiff Sang Lan on 06/19/2011. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo, Winston Sie, Wilson Xue. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 07/12/2011) 07/13/2011 51 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED That, as no party hereto is an infant or incompetent, this action and all claims asserted therein are vohuntarily dismissed with prejudice and with no order of costs or attorney's fees to either party. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 7/13/2011) (jfe) Modified on 7/18/2011 (djc). (Entered: 07/13/2011) 07/18/2011 52 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis from Ming Hai dated 7/15/11 re: counsel for plaintiff respectfully requests an extension of time for the plaintiff/her attorney to submit an opposition to Defendants Rule 11 Sanction Motion for 90 days or until determinations of the two pending "Motions to Dismiss", whichever is later. ENDORSEMENT: Application denied. Plaintiff shall answer the Rule 11 motion by July 29, 2011, and defendants shall reply by August 5, 2011. ( Responses due by 7/29/2011, Replies due by 8/5/2011.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 7/18/11) (pl) (Entered: 07/18/2011) 07/18/2011 53 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS BETWEEN PLAINTIFF SANG LAN and the DEFENDANTS, TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, TIG SPECIALTY INSURANCE SOLUTIONS, RIVERSTONE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, LLC and THE UNITED STATES GYMNASTICS FEDERATION D/B/A USA GYMNASTICS, as follows: That, as no party hereto is an infant or incompetent, this action and all claims asserted therein are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice and with no order of costs or attorney's fees to either party. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 7/18/2011) (jfe) (Entered: 07/18/2011) 07/19/2011 54 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation) - Motion to Dismiss and Specific Non-Dispositive Motion/Dispute - Motion for Sanctions. Referred to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis. Motions referred to James C. Francis. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 7/18/11) (rjm) (Entered: 07/19/2011) 07/22/2011 55 AFFIDAVIT of Sang Lan in Opposition re: 34 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction., 28 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 3rd Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit K, # 13 Exhibit L, # 14 Exhibit M, # 15 Exhibit N, # 16 Affidavit of service)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 07/22/2011) 07/22/2011 56 AFFIRMATION of Ming Hai in Opposition re: 34 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction., 28 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit O, # 2 Exhibit P, # 3 Affidavit of Service)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 07/22/2011) 07/25/2011 57 FILING ERROR - DUPLICATED DOCKET ENTRY (SEE DOCUMENT #59) - AFFIRMATION of attorney Ming Hai in Opposition re: 34 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction., 28 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit O, # 2 Exhibit P)(Hai, Ming) Modified on 7/25/2011 (ldi). Modified on 7/28/2011 (lb). (Entered: 07/25/2011) 07/25/2011 58 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - (SEE DOCUMENT #59) - AFFIRMATION of Attorney Ming Hai in corrected version in Opposition re: 34 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction., 28 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit O, # 2 Exhibit P, # 3 Affidavit of Service)(Hai, Ming) Modified on 7/28/2011 (lb). (Entered: 07/25/2011) 07/28/2011 59 AFFIRMATION of Ming Hai in Opposition re: 47 MOTION for Sanctions against Plaintiff Sang Lan and her attorney Ming Hai, Esq .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, 3rd Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Certificate of Translation, # 9 Affidavit of Service)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 07/28/2011) 07/28/2011 60 AFFIDAVIT of Sang Lan in Opposition re: 47 MOTION for Sanctions against Plaintiff Sang Lan and her attorney Ming Hai, Esq .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Affidavit Service)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 07/28/2011) 07/29/2011 61 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 43 SECOND MOTION to Amend/Correct 32 Amended Complaint,.. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 07/29/2011) 07/29/2011 62 DECLARATION of Franklin K. Chiu in Opposition re: 43 SECOND MOTION to Amend/Correct 32 Amended Complaint,.. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Initial Complaint, # 2 Exhibit Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, # 3 Exhibit Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, # 4 Exhibit Plaintiff's Affidavit in Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, # 5 Exhibit Plaintiff's Attorney's Affirmation in Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, # 6 Exhibit 5/12/11 AP Article)(Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 07/29/2011) 07/29/2011 63 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Memorandum of Law, Declaration of Franklin K. Chiu, and exhibits annexed thereto, in Opposition to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Leave to Amend and File a Third Amended Complaint served on Plaintiff Sang Lan on 07/29/2011. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 07/29/2011) 08/05/2011 64 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 34 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 08/05/2011) 08/05/2011 65 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Memorandum of Law in Reply and In Further Support of Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(b)(1) served on Plaintiff on 08/05/2011. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 08/05/2011) 08/05/2011 66 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 28 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) .. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 08/05/2011) 08/05/2011 67 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Memorandum of Law in Reply and in Further Support of Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(b)(6) served on Plaintiff on 08/05/2011. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 08/05/2011) 08/05/2011 68 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 47 MOTION for Sanctions against Plaintiff Sang Lan and her attorney Ming Hai, Esq . Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Hugh H. Mo in Reply and in Further Support of Defendants' Motion for Sanctions)(Mo, Hugh) Modified on 8/8/2011 (ldi). (Entered: 08/05/2011) 08/05/2011 69 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Memorandum of Law, and accompanying Declaration of Hugh H. Mo, in Reply and in Further Support of Defendants' Motion for Sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 11 served on Plaintiff on 08/05/2011. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 08/05/2011) 08/05/2011 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Note to Attorney Hugh Hu Mo to RE-FILE Document 68 Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion. ERROR(S): Supporting documents must be filed separately, each receiving their own document number. Declaration in Support of Motion is found under the event list Replies, Opposition and Supporting Documents. (ldi) (Entered: 08/08/2011) 08/08/2011 70 DECLARATION of Hugh H. Mo in Support re: 47 MOTION for Sanctions against Plaintiff Sang Lan and her attorney Ming Hai, Esq .. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 08/08/2011) 08/08/2011 71 REPLY AFFIRMATION of Ming Hai in Support re: 43 SECOND MOTION to Amend/Correct 32 Amended Complaint,.. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of service)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 08/08/2011) 08/08/2011 72 REPLY AFFIDAVIT of SANG LAN in Support re: 43 SECOND MOTION to Amend/Correct 32 Amended Complaint,.. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Affidavit OF SERVICE)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 08/08/2011) 08/31/2011 73 MOTION for Ming Hai to Withdraw as Attorney for plaintiff . Document filed by Sang Lan. Return Date set for 9/15/2011 at 09:30 AM.(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 08/31/2011) 08/31/2011 74 AFFIDAVIT of Ming Hai in Support re: 73 MOTION for Ming Hai to Withdraw as Attorney for plaintiff .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Affidavit of Service, # 6 Affidavit of Additional Service by FedEx)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 08/31/2011) 08/31/2011 75 AFFIDAVIT of Rachel Yang in Support re: 73 MOTION for Ming Hai to Withdraw as Attorney for plaintiff .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Service, # 2 Affidavit of additional service by FedEx)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 08/31/2011) 09/01/2011 76 ORDER: that plaintiff and defendants shall submit any response to the motion no later than 9/16/2011 and Ming Hai shall reply by 9/23/2011. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 9/1/2011) (ft) (Entered: 09/01/2011) 09/08/2011 77 RESPONSE to Motion re: 73 MOTION for Ming Hai to Withdraw as Attorney for plaintiff .. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 09/08/2011) 09/19/2011 78 REPLY to Response to Motion re: 73 MOTION for Ming Hai to Withdraw as Attorney for plaintiff .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E of emails of Sang Lan and Huang Jian, # 6 Affidavit of Service)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 09/19/2011) 10/12/2011 79 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation). Referred to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 10/11/2011) (ama) (Entered: 10/12/2011) 10/31/2011 80 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 73 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Ming Hai terminated. Because plaintiff's counsel proffers satisfactory reasons for requesting to be relieved pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.4, and because his withdrawal will not unnecessarily delay the proceedings, his motion to withdraw is granted. The Court shall, however, retain jurisdiction over Mr. Hai in connection with the defendant's motion for sanctions, which will be considered in conjunction with the pending motions to amend and dismiss. Mr. Hai shall immediately deliver a copy of this Order to the plaintiff and turn over to the plaintiff all documents in his possession related to this litigation. By 12/15/2011, the plaintiff shall appear by new counsel or shall advise the Court in writing that she intends to proceed pro se. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 10/31/2011) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ae) (Entered: 10/31/2011) 11/21/2011 81 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint (Docket no. 43) should be granted. The defendants motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Docket no. 34) should be denied. The defendants motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Docket no. 28) should be granted with regard to the plaintiffs claims for defamation against Mr. Mo and Ms. Liu, civil conspiracy, primafacie tort, promissory estoppel, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and eight of her ten alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The motion should granted with leave for the plaintiff to re-plead with regard to her claims for unjust enrichment, conversion, and breach of fiduciary duty based on misappropriation of funds. The motion should be denied with respect to the plaintiffs claim for breach of fiduciary duty based on the defendants unauthorized use of her likeness in 2008, for invasion of privacy, and for defamation against Mr. Liu. The defendants motion for sanctions (Docket no. 47) should be denied without prejudice to being reviewed when the extent to which sanctions are proper becomes clear. Objections to RR due by 12/8/2011 (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 11/21/2011) (ft) (Entered: 11/21/2011) 11/21/2011 106 INTERNET CITATION NOTE: Material from decision with Internet citation re: 81 Report and Recommendations. (tro) (Entered: 05/31/2012) 12/05/2011 82 OBJECTION to 81 Report and Recommendations by the Magistrate Judge Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit C, # 3 Exhibit D, # 4 Affidavit of Service)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 12/05/2011) 12/08/2011 83 OBJECTION to 81 Report and Recommendations by Defendants Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo, Winston Sie, Wilson Xue. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Translation, # 2 Exhibit Photos of CD and Cover Pages, # 3 Exhibit English Translations)(Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 12/08/2011) 12/14/2011 84 MEMORANDUM: Having successfully moved to be relieved as an attorney after a motion to withdraw as attorney for plaintiff, Ming Hai has no standing to file any documents on behalf of plaintiff in this capacity. He seeks standing to file in the capacity of a party against whom defendants continue to seek monetary sanctions but his 23 page memorandum is not limited to the questions of this alleged liability. This document is not received on behalf of the plaintiff and will not be so regarded by this Court. If plaintiff wishes to file a document in response to the Magistrate's report she may do so by 1/31/2012 but not thereafter. Set Deadlines/Hearing as to (Objections to RR due by 1/31/2012) (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 12/14/2011) (ft) (Entered: 12/15/2011) 12/15/2011 85 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by X. Bing Xu on behalf of Sang Lan (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 12/15/2011) 12/15/2011 86 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Sang Lan.(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 12/15/2011) 01/23/2012 87 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION to Compel Ming Hai to turn over documents. Document filed by Sang Lan. Return Date set for 2/23/2012 at 09:00 AM. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Affirmation in support of Motion to Compel, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Supplement Case, # 8 Supplement Case2)(Xu, X. Bing) Modified on 1/24/2012 (ldi). (Entered: 01/23/2012) 01/23/2012 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Note to Attorney X. Bing Xu to RE-FILE Document 87 MOTION to Compel Ming Hai to turn over documents. ERROR(S): Supporting documents must be filed separately, each receiving their own document number. Affirmation in Support of Motion is found under the event list Replies, Opposition and Supporting Documents. (ldi) (Entered: 01/24/2012) 01/24/2012 88 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - AFFIRMATION of Sang Lan in Support re: 87 MOTION to Compel Ming Hai to turn over documents. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Xu, X. Bing) Modified on 1/24/2012 (ldi). (Entered: 01/24/2012) 01/24/2012 89 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - AFFIRMATION of Sang Lan's former attorney Ming Hai in Opposition re: 87 MOTION to Compel Ming Hai to turn over documents.. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Hai, Ming) Modified on 1/24/2012 (ldi). (Entered: 01/24/2012) 01/24/2012 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Note to Attorney X. Bing Xu to RE-FILE Document 88 Affirmation in Support of Motion. ERROR(S): Document linked to filing error. (ldi) (Entered: 01/24/2012) 01/24/2012 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Note to Attorney Ming Hai to RE-FILE Document 89 Affirmation in Opposition to Motion. ERROR(S): Document linked to filing error. (ldi) (Entered: 01/24/2012) 01/24/2012 90 MOTION to Compel Ming Hai to Turn Over Documents. Document filed by Sang Lan.(Xu, X. Bing) Modified on 8/8/2013 (lmb). (Entered: 01/24/2012) 01/24/2012 91 AFFIRMATION of X. Bing Xu, Esquire in Support re: 90 MOTION to Compel Ming Hai to Turn Over Documents.. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 01/24/2012) 01/24/2012 92 AFFIRMATION of Sang Lan in Support re: 90 MOTION to Compel Ming Hai to Turn Over Documents.. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit B1, # 4 Exhibit B1 translation)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 01/24/2012) 01/25/2012 93 AFFIRMATION of Sang Lan's former attorney Ming Hai in Opposition re: 90 MOTION to Compel Ming Hai to Turn Over Documents.. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 01/25/2012) 01/26/2012 94 RESPONSE re: 81 Report and Recommendations,,,,, 84 Order, Set Motion and RR Deadlines/Hearings,,,,,,. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 01/26/2012) 02/03/2012 95 ORDER: Settlement Conference set for 2/27/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 18D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge James C. Francis, and as further set forth in this document. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 2/3/2012) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (cd) (Entered: 02/03/2012) 02/27/2012 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge James C. Francis: Settlement Conference held on 2/27/2012. (js) (Entered: 02/29/2012) 03/02/2012 96 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF RULE 11 MOTION: the undersigned counsel hereby consents to the partial dismissal of their pending Motion for Sanctions. pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 11, only as against attorney Ming Hai, Esq., with prejudice, and without costs, expenses or attorneys' fees to any of the parties as against the other, and pursuant to the attached Agreement of Settlement, with the settlement amount redacted. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 3/2/2012) (pl) Modified on 3/5/2012 (pl). (Main Document 96 replaced on 3/6/2012, See Page 3 replaced. See Endorsed Letter 97 which ordered that this page be replaced.) (tro). Modified on 3/6/2012 (tro). (Main Document 96 replaced on 3/7/2012, pursuant to instructions from Chambers, page 3 redacted) (tro). Modified on 3/7/2012 (tro). (Entered: 03/05/2012) 03/06/2012 97 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated 3/4/2012 re: We kindly ask the Court to replace the first page of the Settlement Agreement with the enclosed copy, which includes a footnote. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The Settlement Agreement and release is amended accordingly. So ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 3/6/2012) (rjm) (Main Document 97 replaced on 3/7/2012, as per Chamber's instructions, page 2 redacted version) (tro). Modified on 3/7/2012 (tro). (Entered: 03/06/2012) 04/23/2012 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO E-MAIL PDF. Note to Attorney X. Bing Xu for noncompliance with Section 14.3 of the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules Instructions. E-MAIL the PDF for Document 1 Complaint, to: caseopenings@nysd.uscourts.gov. (rjm) (Entered: 04/23/2012) 04/23/2012 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO E-MAIL PDF. Note to Attorney X. Bing Xu for noncompliance with Section 14.3 of the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules Instructions. E-MAIL the PDF for Document 4 Amended Complaint, to: caseopenings@nysd.uscourts.gov. (rjm) (Entered: 04/23/2012) 04/23/2012 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO E-MAIL PDF. Note to Attorney X. Bing Xu to E-MAIL the PDF for Document 32 Amended Complaint to: caseopenings@nysd.uscourts.gov. All pdfs must include case number and corresponding document number. (rjm) (Entered: 04/23/2012) 05/09/2012 98 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: for 47 Motion for Sanctions filed by Winston Sie, K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, K.S. Liu, Gina Liu, Wilson Xue, Hugh Mo, 81 Report and Recommendations, 34 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Winston Sie, K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, K.S. Liu, Gina Liu, Wilson Xue, Hugh Mo, 28 Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, K.S. Liu, Wilson Xue, Hugh Mo, 43 Motion to Amend/Correct filed by Sang Lan. For the above reasons, Defendants' motion for sanctions against Plaintiff is denied: Defendants' motion to dismiss Count 9 is granted with leave to replead; and Defendants' motion to dismiss Count 10 is granted with respect to Hugh Mo and denied with respect to K.S. Liu and Gina Liu. In all other respects, Judge Francis's RR is affirmed. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 5/9/2012) (jfe) (Entered: 05/09/2012) 05/10/2012 99 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING FOR NON-ECF DOCUMENT - FIRST MOTION to Set Aside 96 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal,,, by Ming Hai, former attorney for Plainitff . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Errata C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Affidavit of Service)(Hai, Ming) Modified on 5/11/2012 (ldi). (Entered: 05/10/2012) 05/10/2012 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY THAT THE ATTEMPTED FILING OF Document No. 99 HAS BEEN REJECTED. Note to Attorney Ming Hai : THE CLERK'S OFFICE DOES NOT ACCEPT LETTERS FOR FILING, either through ECF or otherwise, except where the judge has ordered that a particular letter be docketed. Letters may be sent directly to a judge. (ldi) (Entered: 05/11/2012) 05/11/2012 100 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - FIRST MOTION to Set Aside 96 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal,,, by Ming Hai, former attorney for plaintiff . Document filed by Sang Lan.(Hai, Ming) Modified on 5/14/2012 (db). (Entered: 05/11/2012) 05/11/2012 101 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - AFFIRMATION of Ming Hai in Support re: 100 FIRST MOTION to Set Aside 96 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal,,, by Ming Hai, former attorney for plaintiff .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Affidavit of Service)(Hai, Ming) Modified on 5/14/2012 (db). (Entered: 05/11/2012) 05/14/2012 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Note to Attorney Ming Hai to RE-FILE Document 100 FIRST MOTION to Set Aside 96 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal, by Ming Hai, former attorney for plaintiff . FIRST MOTION to Set Aside 96 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal, by Ming Hai, former attorney for plaintiff . ERROR(S): No signature or s/. (db) (Entered: 05/14/2012) 05/14/2012 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Note to Attorney Ming Hai to RE-FILE Document 101 Affirmation in Support of Motion. ERROR(S): Document linked to filing error. (db) (Entered: 05/14/2012) 05/14/2012 102 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Specific Non-Dispositive Motion/Dispute: Ming Hai's 5/10/2012 Motion to Set Aside Stipulation and Order of Dismissal. Referred to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 5/14/2012) (cd) (Entered: 05/14/2012) 05/14/2012 103 MOTION to Set Aside 96 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal,,,. Document filed by Ming Hai.(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 05/14/2012) 05/14/2012 104 AFFIRMATION of Ming Hai in Support re: 103 MOTION to Set Aside 96 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal,,,.. Document filed by Ming Hai. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Affidavit of Service)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 05/14/2012) 05/14/2012 Transmission to Case Assignment Clerk. Transmitted re: 102 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, to the Case Assignment Clerk for preparation of notice of case assignment/reassignment. (cd) (Entered: 05/29/2012) 05/29/2012 105 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF A REFERRAL TO ANOTHER MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The referral in the above entitled action has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis, for Specific Non-Dispositive Motion/Dispute. Magistrate Judge James C. Francis no longer referred to the case. (sjo) (Entered: 05/29/2012) 06/05/2012 107 ORDER: Set Deadlines/Hearing as to 103 MOTION to Set Aside 96 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal:( Responses due by 6/29/2012, Replies due by 7/13/2012.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 6/5/2012) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (cd) (Entered: 06/05/2012) 06/05/2012 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge James C. Francis: Telephone Conference held on 6/5/2012. (cd) (Entered: 06/06/2012) 06/29/2012 108 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 103 MOTION to Set Aside 96 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal,,,.. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 06/29/2012) 06/29/2012 109 DECLARATION of Hugh H. Mo in Opposition re: 103 MOTION to Set Aside 96 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal,,,.. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit "A", # 2 Exhibit "B", # 3 Exhibit "C", # 4 Exhibit "D", # 5 Exhibit "E", # 6 Exhibit "F")(Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 06/29/2012) 07/03/2012 110 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Attorney Hai's Motion to Set Aside Settlement, Declaration of Hugh H. Mo, Esq., and exhibits served on SANG LAN and MING HAI, ESQ. on 06/29/12. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 07/03/2012) 07/12/2012 111 REPLY AFFIRMATION of Ming Hai in Support re: 103 MOTION to Set Aside 96 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal,,,.. Document filed by Ming Hai. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Affidavit of Service)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 07/12/2012) 07/25/2012 112 ORDER: A pretrial conference having been held by telephone on July 25, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Any motion to amend the pleadings shall be served and filed by October 7, 2012. 2. All discovery shall be completed by February 28, 2013. 3. The pretrial order shall be submitted by March 29, 2013 unless any dispositive motion is filed by that date. If such a motion is filed, the pretrial order shall be due thirty days after the motion is decided. ( Discovery due by 2/28/2013. Motions due by 10/7/2012. Pretrial Order due by 3/29/2013.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 7/25/2012) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ja) (Entered: 07/25/2012) 08/13/2012 113 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: re: 103 MOTION to Set Aside 96 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal, filed by Ming Hai. For the reasons set forth above, Mr. Hais motion to rescind the settlement agreement (Docket no. 103) should be denied. Objections to RR due by 8/30/2012 (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 8/13/2012) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (jfe) (Entered: 08/14/2012) 08/27/2012 114 OBJECTION to 113 Report and Recommendations Document filed by Ming Hai. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Affidavit of Service)(Hai, Ming) (Entered: 08/27/2012) 10/05/2012 115 MOTION to Add Party(ies) Time Warner, Inc.. Document filed by Sang Lan.(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 10/05/2012) 10/05/2012 116 AFFIRMATION of X. Bing Xu, Esquire in Support re: 115 MOTION to Add Party(ies) Time Warner, Inc... Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement 4th Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit exhibit a-f to cpl, # 3 Exhibit exhibit g-j to cpl, # 4 Exhibit exhibit k-m to cpl)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 10/05/2012) 11/05/2012 118 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE: Time Warner, the Liu's, and Attorney Mo wish to proceed directly to motions challenging the allegations in the Fourth Amended Complaint. Time Warner, the Liu's, and Attorney Mo take no position Plaintiff's Motion to Add Party. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion to Add Party (Docket No. 115) is granted and the Fourth Amended Complaint shall be deemed filed as of the date of this Stipulation. This Stipulation may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original including facsimile, copy or email forms, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same document. SO ORDERED. John Does and Jane Does #1 through 15, Inclusive answer due 12/14/2012; Gina Liu answer due 12/14/2012; K.S. Liu answer due 12/14/2012; Hugh Mo answer due 12/14/2012; Ted Turner answer due 12/14/2012.( Responses due by 1/30/2013, Replies due by 2/27/2013.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 11/05/2012) (ama) (Entered: 11/05/2012) 11/20/2012 119 FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT amending 32 Amended Complaint, against Time Warner, Inc., Keo-Sung Liu, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu, Hugh Hu Mo, Does 1-30 with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Sang Lan. Related document: 32 Amended Complaint, filed by Sang Lan.(mro) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/17/2012: # 1 Exhibit A to F, # 2 Exhibit g j, # 3 Exhibit k m) (sac). (Entered: 11/21/2012) 12/03/2012 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO E-MAIL PDF. Note to Attorney X. Bing Xu for noncompliance with Section 14.3 of the S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules Instructions. E-MAIL the PDF for Document 119 Amended Complaint, to: caseopenings@nysd.uscourts.gov. (mro) (Entered: 12/03/2012) 12/06/2012 120 MOTION for Alan W. Bakowski to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8038498. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Time Warner, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificates of Good Standing, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Bakowski, Alan) (Entered: 12/06/2012) 12/06/2012 121 MOTION for James A. Lamberth to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8038667. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Time Warner, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificates of Good Standing, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Lamberth, James) (Entered: 12/06/2012) 12/06/2012 NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 120 MOTION for Alan W. Bakowski to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8038498. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. , 121 MOTION for James A. Lamberth to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8038667. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. . The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu) (Entered: 12/06/2012) 12/10/2012 122 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE: granting 121 Motion for James A. Lamberth to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 12/10/2012) (djc) (Entered: 12/11/2012) 12/10/2012 123 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE: granting 120 Motion for Alan W. Bakowski to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 12/10/2012) (djc) (Entered: 12/11/2012) 12/12/2012 124 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis from Hugh H. Mo dated 12/12/2012 re: Defense counsel writes due to unforeseen circumstances and delays, including repercussions from Hurricane Sandy, the Individual Defendants respectfully ask Your Honor to grant, this application for a brief two-week extension of time to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint to December 28, 2012. This constitutes our first application as it pertains to the Fourth Amended Complaint. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. So Ordered., K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung answer due 12/28/2012; Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually) answer due 12/28/2012; Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund) answer due 12/28/2012; Hugh Hu Mo answer due 12/28/2012. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 12/12/2012) (ago) (Entered: 12/12/2012) 12/14/2012 125 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. All Plaintiffs. Document filed by Time Warner, Inc.. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 12/14/2012) 12/14/2012 126 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Time Warner, Inc..(Bakowski, Alan) (Entered: 12/14/2012) 12/14/2012 127 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted . Document filed by Time Warner, Inc.. Responses due by 1/30/2013(Bakowski, Alan) (Entered: 12/14/2012) 12/14/2012 128 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 127 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted .. Document filed by Time Warner, Inc.. (Bakowski, Alan) (Entered: 12/14/2012) 12/14/2012 129 DECLARATION of Alan W. Bakowski in Support re: 127 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted .. Document filed by Time Warner, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4)(Bakowski, Alan) (Entered: 12/14/2012) 12/27/2012 130 MOTION to Dismiss FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT . Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. Responses due by 1/30/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Letter Requesting Oral Argument)(Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 12/27/2012) 12/27/2012 131 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 130 MOTION to Dismiss FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT .. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 12/27/2012) 12/27/2012 132 DECLARATION of Hugh H. Mo, Esq. in Support re: 130 MOTION to Dismiss FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT .. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit "A")(Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 12/27/2012) 12/27/2012 133 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of NOTICE OF MOTION TO DISMISS FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT, MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT, DECLARATION IN SUPPORT, AND EXHIBITS served on ALL PARTIES on 12/27/2012. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 12/27/2012) 01/29/2013 134 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis, IV, from X. Bing Xu, dated 1/29/2013, re: request for additional time to file Plaintiff's response to defendants' Motion to Dismiss. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff is hereby granted extension of time to respond to Defendant Lius and Mo's Motion to Dismiss on or before February 15, 2013; Defendant Lius and Mo shall file their reply on or before March 1, 2013. Plaintiff is hereby granted extension of time to respond to Defendant Time Warner's Motion to Dismiss on or before February 15 2013; Defendant Time Warner shall file its reply on or before March 1, 2013. So Ordered. ( Motions due by 2/15/2013, Responses due by 2/15/2013, Replies due by 3/1/2013.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 1/29/2013) (ja) (Entered: 01/29/2013) 02/15/2013 135 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 127 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 02/15/2013) 02/15/2013 136 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 130 MOTION to Dismiss FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 02/15/2013) 03/01/2013 137 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 130 MOTION to Dismiss FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT .. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 03/01/2013) 03/01/2013 138 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Defendants' Reply Memorandum of Law served on Sang Lan and Time Warner, Inc. on 03/01/13. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Keo-Sung Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 03/01/2013) 03/01/2013 139 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 127 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted .. Document filed by Time Warner, Inc.. (Bakowski, Alan) (Entered: 03/01/2013) 04/19/2013 140 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 127 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted. 130 MOTION to Dismiss FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT. For the foregoing reasons, I recommend that Time Warner's motion to dismiss (Docket no. 127) be granted in its entirety. I further recommend that the Individual Defendants motion to dismiss (Docket no. 130) be granted in part and denied in part.Specifically, I recommend that the Individual Defendants motion to dismiss be granted with respect to Count Five (Accounting as to Other Property); Count Six (Unjust Enrichment) to the extent that it pertains to the Other Property; Count Seven (Conversion) to the extent that it pertains to insurance proceeds; Count Eight (Breach of Fiduciary Duty against the Lius); Count Nine (Breach of Fiduciary Duty against Mr. Mo); Count Ten (Defamation) to the extent that it pertains to the statements set out in the Fourth Amended Complaint, 185(c) (d), and the document (and its translation) attached to the Fourth Amended Complaint as part of Exh. M (the translation begins, Sang Lan got injured and paralysis at Goodwill Games held in New York in 1998); and Count Twelve(Cyberharassment). The motion should be denied in all other respects. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) and Rules 72, 6(a), and 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have fourteen (14) days from this date to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation. Objections to RR due by 5/6/2013. Respectfully Submitted. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 4/19/2013) Copies Mailed by Chambers. (rsh) Modified on 4/22/2013 (rsh). (Entered: 04/19/2013) 04/30/2013 141 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 81 Report and Recommendations; 103 Motion to Set Aside filed by Ming Hai. Having reviewed the RR and Hai's objections thereto, we adopt the RR and deny Hai's motion. Any other argument made by Hai is meritless. There are no clear errors in the parts of the RR to which Hai did not object. For the reasons set forth herein, we adopt Judge Francis's RR and Hai's motion to set aside the Stipulation is DENIED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 4/30/2013) (ja) Modified on 4/30/2013 (ja). (Entered: 04/30/2013) 05/02/2013 142 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Leonard B. Sand, from James A. Lamberth, dated 4/30/2013, re: Request for Extension or Enlargement of Time to File Responses or Objection to U.S. Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation of April 19, 2013. ENDORSEMENT: Parties are hereby granted extension of time to file their responses or objections to James C. Francis, IV, U.S. Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on or before June 5, 2013. 130 MOTION to Dismiss FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT , 127 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted . ( Responses due by 6/5/2013, Objections to RR due by 6/5/2013) (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 5/2/2013) (ja) (Entered: 05/02/2013) 05/17/2013 143 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Analisa Torres. Judge Leonard B. Sand is no longer assigned to the case. (pgu) (Entered: 05/17/2013) 05/21/2013 144 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Loretta A. Preska. Judge Analisa Torres is no longer assigned to the case. (pgu) (Entered: 05/21/2013) 05/22/2013 145 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Analisa Torres. Judge Loretta A. Preska is no longer assigned to the case. (pgu) (Entered: 05/22/2013) 06/05/2013 146 OBJECTION to 140 Report and Recommendations Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 06/05/2013) 06/24/2013 147 RESPONSE re: 146 Objection to Report and Recommendations and Memorandum of Law in Support of Magistrate Judge Francis's Report and Recommendation . Document filed by Time Warner, Inc.. (Bakowski, Alan) (Entered: 06/24/2013) 08/08/2013 ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 148 Report and Recommendations. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (lmb) (Entered: 08/08/2013) 08/09/2013 148 ORDER withdrawing 90 Motion to Compel. Counsel for the plaintiff having represented that the motion to compel filed on January 24, 2012, may be withdrawn, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to withdraw the motion (Docket no. 90). The motion may be renewed when and if circumstances warrant. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 8/9/2013) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (tro) (Entered: 08/09/2013) 02/25/2014 149 ORDER. For the reasons stated above, the Individual Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED as to Counts Five and Six. The Individual Defendants' motion to dismiss Count Eight is DENIED only as to the allegations that the Lius (1) failed to account for the Fund and (5) misappropriated of Fund assets. In all other respects, Judge Francis' RR is AFFIRMED. Adopting in part 140 Report and Recommendations. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/25/2014) (rjm) (Entered: 02/26/2014) 03/12/2014 150 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 149 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations,. Document filed by Sang Lan.(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 03/12/2014) 03/12/2014 151 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 150 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 149 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations,.. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 03/12/2014) 03/26/2014 152 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 150 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 149 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations,.. Document filed by Gina Liu, K.S. Liu, Keo-Sung Liu, Hugh Mo. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 03/26/2014) 03/26/2014 153 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Memorandum in Opposition served on Plaintiff on March 26, 2014. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 03/26/2014) 03/26/2014 154 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Pedro Medina, Jr on behalf of K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 03/26/2014) 03/31/2014 155 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 150 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 149 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations,.. Document filed by Time Warner, Inc.. (Bakowski, Alan) (Entered: 03/31/2014) 04/01/2014 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge James C. Francis: Telephone Conference held on 4/1/2014. (Bacchus, Michael) (Entered: 04/01/2014) 04/01/2014 156 ORDER: A pretrial conference having been held by telephone on April 1, 2014, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The parties shall exchange Rule 26(a) (1) initial disclosures by April 1, 2014. 2. All discovery shall be completed by August 29, 2013. 2. The pretrial order shall be submitted by September 30, 2014, unless any dispositive motion is filed by that date. If such a motion is filed, the pretrial order shall be due thirty days after the motion is decided. 3. If all parties consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the enclosed consent form should be executed and returned. (Pretrial Order due by 9/30/2014.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 4/1/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (djc) (Entered: 04/01/2014) 04/02/2014 157 ORDER: A pretrial conference having been held by telephone on April 1, 2014, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The scheduling order dated April 1, 2014 (Docket no. 146) is vacated. 2. parties shall exchange Rule 26(a) (1) initial disclosures by April 30, 2014. 3. All discovery shall be completed by August 29, 2014. 4. The pretrial order shall be submitted by September 30, 2014, unless any dispositive motion is filed by that date. If such a motion is filed, the pretrial order shall be due thirty days after the motion is decided. (Discovery due by 8/29/2014. Motions due by 9/30/2014. Pretrial Order due by 9/30/2014.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 4/2/2014)Copies Mailed By Chambers (djc) Modified on 4/2/2014 (djc). (Entered: 04/02/2014) 04/04/2014 158 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Pedro Medina, Jr on behalf of K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo. New Address: The Law Firm of Hugh H. Mo, P.C., 225 Broadway, 27th Floor, New York, New York, United States 10007, 2123851500. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 04/04/2014) 04/11/2014 159 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Conference re: 157 Order, Set Deadlines,,,, addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated April 11, 2014. Document filed by K.S. Gina Hiu-Hung, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Correspondence, # 2 Appendix Proposed Order)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 04/11/2014) 04/11/2014 160 ORDER. Plaintiff's motion is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 150. Denying 150 Motion for Reconsideration. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 4/11/2014) (rjm) (Entered: 04/14/2014) 04/15/2014 161 ANSWER to 119 Amended Complaint, with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 04/15/2014) 04/16/2014 162 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Answer to Fourth Amended Complaint served on X. Bing Xu on April 15, 2014. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu, Hugh Mo. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 04/16/2014) 04/16/2014 163 ORDER denying 159 Letter Motion for Conference. No conference is necessary. Plaintiff's deposition shall precede the depositions of defendants. In light of the fact that plaintiff's counsel has indicated that his client has a medical emergency, plaintiff's counsel shall advise the Court by letter on the first and fifteenth of each month of the plaintiff's medical condition until such time as she is fully capable of participating in the case. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis)(Text Only Order) (Francis, James) (Entered: 04/16/2014) 05/05/2014 164 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from X. Bing Xu dated 4/30/2014 re: I spoke with Mr. Huang Jian (Sang Lan's Husband) on April 25 and 29, 2014 by telephone. Mr. Huang informed that Sang Lan's doctors have not released her from the Hospital because of complications, unhealed wounds and extreme fluctuations of blood pressures and "blood sugar" (I am told the medical term is Pathoglycemia). The doctors need to closely monitor her blood pressure and "blood sugar" to prevent serious complications. Apparently, the wounds are a problem, according to her doctors. There is no significant recovery and she cannot meaningfully participate in discovery at this time. ENDORSEMENT: In light of the information contained in the May 1, 2014 letter of defendants' counsel, third-hand information is no longer sufficient. Subsequent updates shall include documentation from plaintiff's physicians. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 5/5/2014) (djc) (Entered: 05/05/2014) 05/06/2014 165 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL from 160 Order on Motion for Reconsideration, 149 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations,. Document filed by Sang Lan. Filing fee $ 505.00, receipt number 0208-9643718. Form C and Form D are due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 05/06/2014) 05/07/2014 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: 165 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal,. (nd) (Entered: 05/07/2014) 05/07/2014 Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for 165 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal, filed by Sang Lan were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (nd) (Entered: 05/07/2014) 05/13/2014 166 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Thomas L. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9670084. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Sang Lan.(Xu, X. Bing) Modified on 5/14/2014 (wb). (Entered: 05/13/2014) 05/14/2014 NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. 166 MOTION for Thomas L. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9670084. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. . The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing.Missing Proposed Order. Certificates of Good Standing Must be issued form the Suprme Court not the District Court with a Clerk of Court Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days.Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a Proposed Order. (wb) (Entered: 05/14/2014) 05/14/2014 167 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - AMENDED MOTION for Thomas L. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Goodstanding, # 2 Text of Proposed Order proposed order)(Xu, X. Bing) Modified on 5/14/2014 (wb). (Entered: 05/14/2014) 05/14/2014 NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. 167 AMENDED MOTION for Thomas L. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. . Certificate of Good Standing Must be issued from the Supreme Court of Florida with a Clerk of Court Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (wb) (Entered: 05/14/2014) 05/14/2014 168 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - MOTION for Protective Order Confidentiality as to Pre-Trial Materials . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit B1, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D)(Xu, X. Bing) Modified on 5/15/2014 (db). (Entered: 05/14/2014) 05/14/2014 169 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 168 MOTION for Protective Order Confidentiality as to Pre-Trial Materials . . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) Modified on 5/15/2014 (db). (Entered: 05/14/2014) 05/15/2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - EVENT TYPE ERROR. Note to Attorney X. Bing Xu to RE-FILE Document 168 MOTION for Protective Order Confidentiality as to Pre-Trial Materials . Use the event type Memorandum in Support of Motion found under the event list Replies, Opposition and Supporting Documents. ***REMINDER*** - Motion WAS NOT FILED. (db) (Entered: 05/15/2014) 05/15/2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Note to Attorney X. Bing Xu to RE-FILE Document 169 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion. ERROR(S): Document linked to filing error. (db) (Entered: 05/15/2014) 05/15/2014 170 MOTION for Protective Order . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit B1, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 05/15/2014) 05/15/2014 171 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 170 MOTION for Protective Order . Confidentiality as to Pre-Trial Materials . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 05/15/2014) 05/20/2014 172 ORDER: Defendants shall answer the motion for a protective order by May 27, 2014; plaintiff shall reply by May 30, 2014. Defendants' request for a conference with respect to this issue is respectfully denied. Plaintiff's application to stay discovery and defer her deposition is denied. The medical documentation reveals that plaintiff "is allowed to accept media visitors under supervision by the doctor and special care medical staff." If plaintiff is capable of participating in media events, she is capable of participating in the litigation that she initiated. Counsel shall make arrangements for taking her deposition by videoconference, under supervision of the appropriate medical personnel. Set Deadlines/Hearing as to 170 MOTION for Protective Order : Responses due by 5/27/2014, Replies due by 5/30/2014. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 5/20/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (tn) (Entered: 05/20/2014) 05/22/2014 173 MOTION for Thomas L. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certificate of Goodstanding, # 2 Text of Proposed Order Order granting prohavic)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 05/22/2014) 05/27/2014 NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 173 MOTION for Thomas L. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. . The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu) (Entered: 05/27/2014) 05/27/2014 174 DECLARATION of Hugh H. Mo in Opposition re: 170 MOTION for Protective Order .. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit April 30, 2014 Correspondence, # 2 Exhibit May 1, 2014 Correspondence, # 3 Exhibit Endorsed Letter, # 4 Exhibit May 8, 2014 Correspondence, # 5 Exhibit May 9, 2014 Correspondence, # 6 Exhibit May 9, 2014 Correspondence, # 7 Exhibit May 13, 2014 Correspondence, # 8 Exhibit May 14, 2014 Correspondence, # 9 Exhibit Press Conference Correspondence)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 05/27/2014) 05/27/2014 175 FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 170 MOTION for Protective Order . . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 05/27/2014) 05/28/2014 176 ORDER granting 173 Motion for Thomas L. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis)(Text Only Order) (Francis, James) (Entered: 05/28/2014) 05/30/2014 177 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order and the Declaration of Hugh H. Mo served on X. Bing Xu on May 27, 2014. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 05/30/2014) 05/30/2014 178 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 170 MOTION for Protective Order . . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A Plaintiff letter, # 2 Exhibit B Plaintiff letter, # 3 Exhibit C Plaintiff letter)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 05/30/2014) 06/13/2014 179 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - THIRD LETTER MOTION for Conference re: 172 Order, Set Motion and RR Deadlines/Hearings, for an protective order excluding non-party witness from Plaintiff's deposition, order determining Plaintiff should bear costs of videoconference of deposition addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated June 13, 2014. Document filed by Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit I)(Medina, Pedro) Modified on 6/16/2014 (db). (Entered: 06/13/2014) 06/16/2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - EVENT TYPE ERROR. Note to Attorney Pedro Medina to RE-FILE Document 179 THIRD LETTER MOTION for Conference re: 172 Order, Set Motion and RR Deadlines/Hearings, for an protective order excluding non-party witness from Plaintiff's deposition, order determining Plaintiff should bear costs of videoconferen. Use the event type Letter found under the event list Other Documents. (db) (Entered: 06/16/2014) 06/16/2014 180 FIRST LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated June 13, 2014 re: Discovery Disputes. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 06/16/2014) 06/20/2014 181 FIRST LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated June 20, 2014 re: Motion to Compel Responses. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Defendants' Request for Production of Documents, # 2 Exhibit Defendants' Interrogatories, # 3 Exhibit Plaintiffs' Response to Request for Production of Documents, # 4 Exhibit Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Interrogatories, # 5 Exhibit Defendant's Initial Disclosure)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 06/20/2014) 06/20/2014 182 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Pedro Medina, Jr on behalf of Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. New Address: The Law Firm of Hugh H. Mo, P.C., 225 Broadway, Suite 2702, New York, NEW YORK, United States 10007, 2123851500. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 06/20/2014) 06/20/2014 183 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 180 Letter, filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu, Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted in part and denied in part. For plaintiff's deposition, the parties shall utilize the protocol used in 12 civ. 7103, as it apparently worked and plaintiff has not proposed a detailed alternative. Defendants shall bear the costs of the deposition. Huang Jian shall not attend plaintiff's deposition. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 6/20/2014) (djc) Modified on 6/20/2014 (djc). (Entered: 06/20/2014) 06/20/2014 184 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: denying 170 Motion for Protective Order. The plaintiff's motion for a protective order (Docket No. 170) is denied. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 6/20/2014) Copies Sent By Chambers (djc) (Entered: 06/20/2014) 06/25/2014 185 MANDATE of USCA (Certified Copy) as to 165 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal, filed by Sang Lan USCA Case Number 14-1654....that the appeal is hereby WITHDRAWN pursuant to Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Issued As Mandate: 06/25/2014. (nd) (Entered: 06/25/2014) 07/07/2014 186 SECOND LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated July 7, 2014 re: Discovery. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu, Hugh Mo.(Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 07/07/2014) 07/30/2014 187 ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. By August 15, 2014, plaintiff shall produce all documents requested in the Individual Defendants' First Request for Production of Documents to Plaintiff Sang Lan ("Defendants' Document Request"). 2. By August 15, 2014, plaintiff shall propound written responses to Defendants' Document Request in which plaintiff specifically identifies by bates number which documents are responsive to each document request. While Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a party to produce documents as kept in the regular course of business, that rule nevertheless "requires responding parties to provide documents in some kind of organized, indexed fashion rather than as a mass of undifferentiated, unlabeled data." Where, as here, documents are maintained in a wholly disorganized manner, the responding party cannot simply produce them in the same way. 3. By August 15, 2014, plaintiff shall provide amended answers to Individual Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff Sang Lan that properly respond to each interrogatory and do not simply refer defendants to plaintiff's entire document production. 4. Failure to comply with this order shall result in sanctions, potentially including an award of attorneys' fees and costs. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 7/30/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (kgo) (Entered: 07/30/2014) 08/01/2014 188 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated August 1, 2014 re: Discovery. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 08/01/2014) 08/14/2014 189 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on 188 Letter, filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu, Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. (Discovery due by 10/31/2014. Pretrial Order due by 11/29/2014.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 8/13/2014) (cd) Modified on 8/18/2014 (cd). (Entered: 08/14/2014) 08/15/2014 190 NOTICE of Service of Addition Documents and responses re: 187 Order,,,,,. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 08/15/2014) 09/08/2014 191 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - THIRD LETTER MOTION for Conference re: 189 Memo Endorsement, Set Deadlines/Hearings,, 187 Order,,,,, addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated September 8, 2014. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H)(Medina, Pedro) Modified on 9/10/2014 (db). (Entered: 09/08/2014) 09/08/2014 192 FIRST LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated September 8, 2014 re: Rule 11 Safe Harbor. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, John Does and Jane Does #1 through 15, Inclusive, Sang Lan, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 09/08/2014) 09/10/2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Pedro Medina. Document No. 191 Letter. This document is not filed via ECF. The Court permits the filing of letters including certain types of letter motions, a Motion to Stay must be formally filed. (db) (Entered: 09/10/2014) 09/10/2014 193 FOURTH LETTER MOTION for Conference re: 189 Memo Endorsement, Set Deadlines/Hearings,, 187 Order,,,,, addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated September 10, 2014. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 09/10/2014) 09/18/2014 194 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Bing Xu, Esquire dated 9/18/2014 re: 193 FOURTH LETTER MOTION for Conference re: 189 Memo Endorsement, Set Deadlines/Hearings,, 187 Order,,,,, addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated September 10, 2014. . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Liu statement: fight to the end, # 2 Exhibit Mo press release 9/9/14, # 3 Exhibit Liu Blog 9/9/14)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 09/18/2014) 09/19/2014 195 LETTER RESPONSE in Support of Motion addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated September 19, 2014 re: 193 FOURTH LETTER MOTION for Conference re: 189 Memo Endorsement, Set Deadlines/Hearings,, 187 Order,,,,, addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated September 10, 2014. . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 09/19/2014) 09/23/2014 196 ORDER denying 193 Letter Motion for Conference. The requested relief is not warranted. There is no basis for a stay of discovery that would further delay resolution of this case. Plaintiff has complied with my July 30, 2014 Order by matching her production to defendants' discovery requests. To the extent that the production demonstrates that plaintiff has no factual basis for her claims, that issue will be adjudicated in any Rule 11 motion and/or motion for summary judgment. At the same time, plaintiff's suggestion that she may decline to proffer the relevance of information she has produced on the ground that it is attorney work product is frivolous. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis)(Text Only Order) (Francis, James) (Entered: 09/23/2014) 10/01/2014 197 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated October 1, 2014. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 10/01/2014) 10/02/2014 198 ORDER denying 197 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. The party depositions should long since have been scheduled, and there is still a month to complete them. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis)(Text Only Order) (Francis, James) (Entered: 10/02/2014) 10/09/2014 199 FIRST LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Pedro Medina dated October 9, 2014 re: Direct Plaintiff's Attendance For Her Deposition. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 10/09/2014) 10/10/2014 200 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 199 Letter, filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu, Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. This resolves docket no. 199. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 10/10/2014) (djc) (Entered: 10/10/2014) 10/10/2014 Set/Reset Deadlines: Deposition due by 10/16/2014. (djc) (Entered: 10/10/2014) 10/11/2014 201 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, Without prejudice against the defendant(s) Does 1-30, Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, John Does and Jane Does #1 through 15, Inclusive, Keo-Sung Liu, Hugh Mo. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 10/11/2014) 10/15/2014 202 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Conference re: 200 Memo Endorsement, 201 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal,, requesting leave to file motion to dismiss Fourth Amended Complaint with prejudice addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Hugh H. Mo dated October 15, 2014. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 10/15/2014) 10/16/2014 203 ORDER OF REFERENCE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation): Motion to dismiss with prejudice (as discussed in Defendants' October 15, 2014 letter). Specific Non-Dispositive Motion/Dispute - Any additional relief sought in Defendants' October 15, 2014 letter. Referred to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 10/15/2014) (ajs) (Entered: 10/16/2014) 10/20/2014 204 FIRST LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated October 20, 2014 re: Briefing Schedule Regarding Motion Pursuant to Rule 37. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 10/20/2014) 10/21/2014 205 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 204 Letter, filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu, Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. ENDORSEMENT: The schedule set forth above is adopted. (Motions due by 10/24/2014. Responses due by 11/10/2014. Replies due by 11/17/2014.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 10/21/2014) (tn) (Entered: 10/21/2014) 10/24/2014 206 FIRST MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 37 . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 10/24/2014) 10/24/2014 207 FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 206 FIRST MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 37 . . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 10/24/2014) 10/24/2014 208 DECLARATION of Hugh H. Mo in Support re: 206 FIRST MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 37 .. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit Exhibit W)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 10/24/2014) 11/10/2014 209 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 206 FIRST MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 37 ., 202 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Conference re: 200 Memo Endorsement, 201 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal,, requesting leave to file motion to dismiss Fourth Amended Complaint with prejudice addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Hugh H. Mo date 11/10/2014 . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 11/10/2014) 11/10/2014 210 DECLARATION of Sang Lan in Opposition re: 206 FIRST MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 37 .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit C1, # 5 Exhibit c2, # 6 Exhibit c3, # 7 Exhibit c4, # 8 Exhibit D, # 9 Exhibit E, # 10 Exhibit F, # 11 Exhibit G, # 12 Exhibit H, # 13 Exhibit I, # 14 Exhibit J, # 15 Exhibit K, # 16 Exhibit L, # 17 Exhibit M, # 18 Exhibit N, # 19 Exhibit O, # 20 Exhibit P, # 21 Exhibit Q, # 22 Exhibit R, # 23 Exhibit S, # 24 Exhibit T, # 25 Exhibit U, # 26 Exhibit V, # 27 Exhibit W, # 28 Exhibit X, # 29 Exhibit Y, # 30 Exhibit Z, # 31 Exhibit AA, # 32 Exhibit BB, # 33 Exhibit CC, # 34 Exhibit DD, # 35 Exhibit EE, # 36 Exhibit FF, # 37 Exhibit GG, # 38 Exhibit HH, # 39 Exhibit II, # 40 Exhibit JJ)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 11/10/2014) 11/10/2014 211 DECLARATION of ZHENXING SUN in Opposition re: 206 FIRST MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 37 .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 11/10/2014) 11/17/2014 212 DECLARATION of Kao-Sung Liu in Support re: 206 FIRST MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 37 .. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit M)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 11/17/2014) 11/17/2014 213 DECLARATION of Hugh H. Mo in Support re: 206 FIRST MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 37 .. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit Exhibit X, # 25 Exhibit Exhibit Y, # 26 Exhibit Exhibit Z, # 27 Exhibit Exhibit AA, # 28 Exhibit Exhibit BB, # 29 Exhibit Exhibit CC, # 30 Exhibit Exhibit DD, # 31 Exhibit Exhibit EE, # 32 Exhibit Exhibit FF, # 33 Exhibit Exhibit GG, # 34 Exhibit Exhibit HH, # 35 Exhibit Exhibit II, # 36 Exhibit Exhibit JJ)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 11/17/2014) 11/17/2014 214 FIRST REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 206 FIRST MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 37 . . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 11/17/2014) 02/05/2015 215 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the foregoing reasons, dismissal without prejudice at this juncture would be improper. I therefore recommend that the plaintiff's motion to dismiss without prejudice be denied and that the Clerk of Court be directed to re-open the case, which was closed upon the filing of the ineffective notice of voluntary dismissal. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rules 72, 6(a), and 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have fourteen (14) days from this date to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation. Such objections shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court, with extra copies delivered to the chambers of the Honorable Analisa Torres, Room 2210, and to the chambers of the undersigned, Room 1960, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007. Failure to file timely objections will preclude appellate review. Objections to RR due by 2/23/2015 (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 2/5/2015) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (tn) Modified on 2/26/2015 (tn). (Entered: 02/05/2015) 02/05/2015 216 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 206 Motion for Sanctions: For the foregoing reasons, the defendants' motion for Rule 37 sanctions (Docket no. 206) is granted with respect to monetary sanctions and denied with respect to terminating sanctions. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 2/5/2015) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (tn) (Entered: 02/05/2015) 02/18/2015 217 AFFIDAVIT of Hugh H. Mo For Costs and Attorneys' Fees Pursuant to Rule 37 Sanctions . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu, Hugh Mo. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 02/18/2015) 02/18/2015 218 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Defendants' Affidavit for Costs and Attorneys' Fees Pursuant to Rule 37 Sanctions served on X. Bing Xu on February 18, 2015. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu, Hugh Mo. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 02/18/2015) 02/18/2015 219 SECOND MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 02/18/2015) 02/18/2015 220 DECLARATION of Kao-Sung Liu in Support re: 219 SECOND MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 .. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit M)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 02/18/2015) 02/18/2015 221 FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 219 SECOND MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 . . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 02/18/2015) 02/18/2015 222 DECLARATION of Hugh H. Mo in Support re: 219 SECOND MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 .. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 1), # 9 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 2), # 10 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 3), # 11 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 4), # 12 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 5), # 13 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 6), # 14 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 7), # 15 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 8), # 16 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 9), # 17 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 10), # 18 Exhibit Exhibit I, # 19 Exhibit Exhibit J, # 20 Exhibit Exhibit K, # 21 Exhibit Exhibit L)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 02/18/2015) 02/19/2015 223 OBJECTION to 215 Report and Recommendations with incorporated Memorandum of Law Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 02/19/2015) 02/19/2015 224 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 216 Order on Motion for Sanctions, . Document filed by Sang Lan.(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 02/19/2015) 02/19/2015 225 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 224 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 216 Order on Motion for Sanctions, . . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 02/19/2015) 02/23/2015 226 FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 224 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 216 Order on Motion for Sanctions, . . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Appendix A, # 2 Appendix Appendix B)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 02/23/2015) 02/24/2015 227 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider served on X. Bing Xu on February 24, 2015. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 02/24/2015) 02/26/2015 228 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Vincent Golaszewski on behalf of Sang Lan. (Golaszewski, John) (Entered: 02/26/2015) 02/26/2015 229 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Allan Steven Schiller on behalf of Sang Lan. (Schiller, Allan) (Entered: 02/26/2015) 02/26/2015 230 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Brian Patrick Fredericks on behalf of Sang Lan. (Fredericks, Brian) (Entered: 02/26/2015) 02/27/2015 231 ORDER denying 224 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff has failed to identify any controlling case law or factual information on the record that the Court overlooked. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis)(Text Only Order) (Francis, James) (Entered: 02/27/2015) 02/27/2015 232 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated February 27, 2015 re: Response to Plaintiff's counsel's letter dated February 26, 2015. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 02/27/2015) 02/27/2015 233 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from X. Bing Xu, and Thomas L. Johnson dated 2/26/2015 re: Counsel request a conference, either in person or via telephone, with the Court such that we may discuss outstanding discovery, and set a new discovery timeline. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff shall respond to the fee affidavit by March 13, 2015, and defendants shall reply by March 20, 2015. Plaintiff has filed an objection to the Report Recommendation that recommended denial of the motion to dismiss without prejudice. It would be premature to set any further discovery schedule until the objection is ruled upon. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 2/27/2015) (tn) (Entered: 02/27/2015) 03/03/2015 234 FIRST RESPONSE re: 223 Objection to Report and Recommendations . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 03/03/2015) 03/03/2015 235 DECLARATION of Hugh H. Mo re: 234 Response, 223 Objection to Report and Recommendations . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 03/03/2015) 03/04/2015 236 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from X. Bing Xu dated 3/4/2015 re: Counsel requests that the Court grant the request for a 10 day, or any brief and reasonable extension the Court deems necessary and appropriate, to respond to Defendant's Rule 11 motion. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff's Application is hereby granted. Plaintiff shall respond Defendants Rule 11 Motion on or before 3/20/15; Defendant shall file their reply on or before 3/27/15. Set Deadlines/Hearing as to 219 SECOND MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 : Responses due by 3/20/2015, Replies due by 3/27/2015. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 3/4/2015) (tn) Modified on 3/4/2015 (tn). Modified on 4/1/2015 (tn). (Entered: 03/04/2015) 03/11/2015 237 Objection re: 216 Order on Motion for Sanctions, . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 03/11/2015) 03/13/2015 238 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: 206 FIRST MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 37 . objection to refiled doc 217 . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Bing Xu, Esquire, # 2 Exhibit A1 summary, # 3 Exhibit A2 140717 bill, # 4 Exhibit A3 141030 bill)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 03/13/2015) 03/13/2015 239 DECLARATION of Bing Xu, Esquire in Opposition re: 206 FIRST MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 37 .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A1 Summary, # 2 Exhibit A2 140717 bill, # 3 Exhibit A3 141030 bill, # 4 Exhibit A4 141124 bill)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 03/13/2015) 03/20/2015 240 FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support of Defendants' Application for Attorneys Fees and Costs . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 03/20/2015) 03/20/2015 241 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 219 SECOND MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 . . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Sang Lan Decl. in support, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 03/20/2015) 03/24/2015 242 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Motion re: 219 SECOND MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 .. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 03/24/2015) 03/25/2015 243 ORDER withdrawing 219 Motion for Sanctions. Defendants have withdrawn the motion without prejudice to submitting a subsequent application for sanctions. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis)(Text Only Order) (Francis, James) (Entered: 03/25/2015) 03/25/2015 244 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Bing Xu, Esquire and Thomas Johnson, Esquire dated 3/25/2015 re: Def. Notice of Withdrawal of Rule 11 Motion. Document filed by Sang Lan.(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 03/25/2015) 03/26/2015 245 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 244 Letter filed by Sang Lan. ENDORSEMENT: Application denied without prejudice to renewal when the merits of this case are ultimately decided. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 3/26/2015) (tn) (Entered: 03/26/2015) 04/01/2015 246 FIRST LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Hugh H. Mo dated April 1, 2015 re: Proposed Briefing Schedule. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 04/01/2015) 04/01/2015 247 LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from bing Xu, Esquire and Thomas Johnson, Esquire dated 4/1/2015 re: Mr. Mo's Letter dkt 246 4/1/201. Document filed by Sang Lan.(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 04/01/2015) 04/01/2015 248 SECOND LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Hugh H. Mo dated April 1, 2015 re: Proposed Briefing Schedule. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 04/01/2015) 04/01/2015 249 LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Bing Xu, Esquire and Thomas Johnson, Esquire dated 4/1/2015 re: Response to Defendants 2d Letter. Document filed by Sang Lan.(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 04/01/2015) 04/02/2015 250 ORDER: Having reviewed the parties' letters dated April 1, 2015, it is ORDERED that Defendants shall submit opposition papers by April 17, 2015, and Plaintiff shall submit reply papers by April 24, 2015. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 4/2/2015) (ajs) (Entered: 04/02/2015) 04/17/2015 251 FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 237 Objection (non-motion) . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Appendix A, # 2 Appendix Appendix B, # 3 Appendix Appendix C)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 04/17/2015) 04/17/2015 252 FIRST LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Hugh H. Mo dated April 17, 2015 re: Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Rule 72(a) Objections. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 04/17/2015) 04/24/2015 253 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 237 Objection (non-motion), 251 Memorandum of Law in Opposition, . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 04/24/2015) 05/04/2015 254 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The inordinate time spent by counsel in litigating this fee issue is symptomatic of the waste of resources in this litigation. Based on reductions in the requested fees to reflect non-compensable time, the defendants are awarded $20,627.78 in attorneys' fees and $405.00 in expenses, for a total of $21,032.78. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 5/4/2015) Copies Sent by Chambers. (ajs) (Entered: 05/04/2015) 05/12/2015 255 MOTION for Bing Xu, Esquire and Thomas Johnson, Esquire to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Sang Lan.(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 05/12/2015) 05/13/2015 256 FIRST LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Hugh H. Mo dated May 13, 2015 re: Unsealing of Declaration and Exhibits of Plaintiff's attorneys' Notice of Motion to Withdraw. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 05/13/2015) 05/15/2015 257 THIRD MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 05/15/2015) 05/15/2015 258 FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 257 THIRD MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 . . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 05/15/2015) 05/15/2015 259 DECLARATION of Hugh H. Mo in Support re: 257 THIRD MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 .. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, Pt. 1, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit G, Pt. 2, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit G, Pt. 3, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit G, Pt. 4, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit G, Pt. 5, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit G, Pt. 6, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit G, Pt. 7, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit G, Pt. 8, # 15 Exhibit Exhibit G, Pt. 9, # 16 Exhibit Exhibit G, Pt. 10, # 17 Exhibit Exhibit H, # 18 Exhibit Exhibit I, # 19 Exhibit Exhibit J, # 20 Exhibit Exhibit K, # 21 Exhibit Exhibit L, # 22 Exhibit Exhibit M)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 05/15/2015) 05/15/2015 260 DECLARATION of Kao-Sung Liu in Support re: 257 THIRD MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 .. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Hugh Mo. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit M)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 05/15/2015) 05/15/2015 261 ORDER: The Court has received correspondence concerning The Bing Law Firm's motion to withdraw from further representation of plaintiff Sang Lan. Judges Torres and Francis have agreed that I will rule with respect to that motion. Since the circumstances are somewhat unusual, I wish to hold a telephone conference to discuss the procedure we will follow. Counsel therefore are directed to place a conference call to my Chambers by May 20, 2015, to arrange a mutually convenient date for the conference. All counsel of record will be required to participate in the telephone conference. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Frank Maas on 5/14/2015) Copies Sent By Chambers. (lmb) (Entered: 05/15/2015) 05/15/2015 262 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiff; Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Sanctions; Declaration of Hugh H. Mo, dated May 15, 2015; Declaration of K.S. Liu, dated November 17, 2014 served on Plaintiff Sang Lan on May 15, 2015. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 05/15/2015) 05/15/2015 263 LETTER MOTION for Conference addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from John V. Golaszewski, Esq. dated May 15, 2015. Document filed by Sang Lan.(Golaszewski, John) (Entered: 05/15/2015) 05/18/2015 264 FIRST LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Hugh H. Mo dated May 18, 2015 re: Response to Plaintiff's counsel's letter dated May 15, 2015. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 05/18/2015) 05/18/2015 265 ORDER denying 263 Letter Motion for Conference: Plaintiff's request for a conference is DENIED. However, Plaintiff may renew this request before Judge Francis. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Analisa Torres)(Text Only Order) (Torres, Analisa) (Entered: 05/18/2015) 05/18/2015 266 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Frank Maas from X. Bing Xu and Thomas L. Johnson dated 5/15/2015 re: Telephone Conference. ENDORSEMENT: Approved. (Telephone Conference set for 5/20/2015 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Frank Maas.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Frank Maas on 5/18/2015) (kko) (Entered: 05/19/2015) 05/20/2015 Minute Order Proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Frank Maas: Telephone Conference held on 5/20/2015. (mo) (Entered: 05/20/2015) 05/20/2015 267 ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that by May 29, 2015, The Bing Law Firm shall file redacted versions of its papers in support of its Motion to Withdraw, (ECF No. 255), and shall file under seal and deliver to my Chambers unredacted versions of those papers. Furthermore, by June 8, 2015, counsel for the Defendants shall file any opposition papers. (Responses due by 6/8/2015) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Frank Maas on 5/20/2015) Copies Sent By Chambers via Fax. (rjm) (Entered: 05/21/2015) 05/20/2015 Transmission to Sealed Records Clerk. Transmitted re: 267 Order, Set Deadlines to the Sealed Records Clerk for the sealing or unsealing of document or case. (rjm) (Entered: 05/21/2015) 05/21/2015 268 Objection re: 254 Order, Assessing Fees and Costs . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Golaszewski, John) (Entered: 05/21/2015) 05/28/2015 269 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated 5/1/2014 re: We write in response to the letter, dated April 30, 2014, from plaintiff Sang Lan's attorney, X. Bing Xu, reporting on plaintiff's medical condition and asserting her current inability to participate in discovery in this case at the present time. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(lmb) (Entered: 05/28/2015) 05/28/2015 270 LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from X. Bing Xu, Thomas L. Johnson dated 5/27/2015 re: Correspondence under seal. (ajs) (Entered: 05/28/2015) 05/28/2015 271 ORDER: By letter dated May 27, 2015, Plaintiff requests that the Court deny or stay determination of the Rule 11 motion until the end of litigation, adjust the briefing schedule for the Rule 11 motion, and permit Plaintiff to file her motion papers under seal. This case is currently before the Honorable James C. Francis IV for general pretrial proceedings. Plaintiff's requests are DENIED without prejudice to renewal before Judge Francis. With respect to communications with this Court, Plaintiff shall file all letters electronically on ECF or shall request to file under seal in accordance with Paragraph IV.A of this Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 5/28/2015) (ajs) (Entered: 05/28/2015) 05/28/2015 272 FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 268 Objection (non-motion) to Magistrate Judge Francis' May 4, 2015 Memorandum and Order . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 05/28/2015) 05/29/2015 273 FIRST LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Pedro Medina dated May 29, 2015 re: Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Rule 72(a) Objections. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 05/29/2015) 05/29/2015 274 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 255 MOTION for Bing Xu, Esquire and Thomas Johnson, Esquire to Withdraw as Attorney . . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 05/29/2015) 05/29/2015 275 DECLARATION of X. Bing Xu, Esquire in Support re: 255 MOTION for Bing Xu, Esquire and Thomas Johnson, Esquire to Withdraw as Attorney .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-G)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 05/29/2015) 06/01/2015 276 FIRST LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated June 1, 2015 re: Response to Plaintiff's counsel's letter dated May 29, 2015. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 06/01/2015) 06/01/2015 277 DECLARATION of Sang Lan in Support re: 255 MOTION for Bing Xu, Esquire and Thomas Johnson, Esquire to Withdraw as Attorney .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 06/01/2015) 06/02/2015 278 ENDORSED LETTER re: 257 THIRD MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 . filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu, Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from X. Bing Xu dated 5/29/2015 re: Co-counsel to plaintiff Sang Lan requests a reasonable extension to the briefing schedule proposed by Plaintiff and her counsel, and grant counsel's motion for leave to file documents referred to in his motion papers for in camera examination. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff's and her counsel's Application to file certain documents or portions thereof under seal is hereby granted. Plaintiff shall respond Defendant Rule 11 Motion on or before June 10, 2015 Plaintiff's counsel shall respond Defendants' Rule 11 Motion on or before June 10, 2015 Defendants shall file their reply on or before June 22, 2015. Set Deadlines/Hearing as to 257 THIRD MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 : Responses due by 6/10/2015, Replies due by 6/22/2015. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 6/1/2015) (tn) (Entered: 06/02/2015) 06/03/2015 279 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW re: 268 Objection (non-motion) to Order Assessing Fees and Costs . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Golaszewski, John) (Entered: 06/03/2015) 06/05/2015 280 FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 255 MOTION for Bing Xu, Esquire and Thomas Johnson, Esquire to Withdraw as Attorney . Response to Motion . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 06/05/2015) 06/10/2015 281 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 257 THIRD MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 . and Cross Motion for Rule 11 Sanction Against Defendants and Hugh Mo Esquire, Pedro Medina Esquire and Law Office of Hugh Mo P.C. . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 06/10/2015) 06/10/2015 282 DECLARATION of X. Bing Xu, Esquire in Opposition re: 257 THIRD MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit G)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 06/10/2015) 06/10/2015 283 THIRD MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 257 THIRD MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 . On Behalf of Plaintiff Sang Lan . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Golaszewski, John) (Entered: 06/10/2015) 06/12/2015 284 LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from X. Bing Xu, Thomas L. Johnson dated 6/10/2015 re: Request to seal Dkt. No. 270. (ajs) (Entered: 06/12/2015) 06/12/2015 285 ORDER: By letter dated June 10, 2015, Plaintiff requests to: (1) submit to the Court un-redacted copies of Plaintiff's memorandum of law and supporting documents in opposition to Defendants' third Rule 11 motion; and (2) remove her May 27, 2015 letter from the public docket. The Rule 11 motion is before the Honorable James C. Francis. Plaintiff's request to submit un-redacted documents to this Court is DENIED. Plaintiff's request to remove her May 27, 2015 letter from the public docket is DENIED. "Documents may be sealed if specific, on the record findings are made demonstrating that closure is essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest." Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006) (quoting In re New York Times Co., 828 F.3d 110, 116 (2d Cir. 1987)). Although Plaintiff provided legal justification for the proposed sealing of portions of her opposition to the Rule 11 motion, she provided no basis to justify sealing the May 27, 2015 letter. As the Court has reminded Plaintiff on several occasions, this case is currently before Judge Francis for general pretrial proceedings. Plaintiff shall include Judge Francis on all correspondence and communications with the Court. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with the Court's directives may result in sanctions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 6/12/2015) (ajs) (Entered: 06/12/2015) 06/16/2015 286 FIRST LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Pedro Medina dated June 16, 2015 re: Request to File Over sized Reply Memorandum of Law. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 06/16/2015) 06/17/2015 287 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 286 Letter, filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu, Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. ENDORSEMENT: Defendants' reply may consist of up to 20 pages. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 6/17/2015) (tn) (Main Document 287 replaced on 6/17/2015) (tn). (Entered: 06/17/2015) 06/22/2015 288 FIRST REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 257 THIRD MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 . . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 06/22/2015) 06/22/2015 289 DECLARATION of Hugh H. Mo in Support re: 257 THIRD MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 .. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 06/22/2015) 07/13/2015 290 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 257 Motion for Sanctions: that the defendants' motion (Docket no. 257) is denied without prejudice; the cross-motions of the plaintiff and her counsel (Docket nos. 281 and 283) are denied as moot. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 7/13/2015) Copies Transmitted By Chambers. (tn) (Entered: 07/13/2015) 01/08/2016 291 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from John V. Golaszewski, Esq. dated January 8, 2016 re: Request for Conference. Document filed by Sang Lan.(Golaszewski, John) (Entered: 01/08/2016) 01/08/2016 292 FIRST LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated January 8, 2015 re: Response to Plaintiff's counsel's letter dated January 8, 2016. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 01/08/2016) 01/08/2016 293 SECOND LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from John V. Golaszewski, Esq. dated January 8, 2016 re: Request for Conference. Document filed by Sang Lan.(Golaszewski, John) (Entered: 01/08/2016) 01/08/2016 294 SECOND LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated January 8, 2016 re: Response to Plaintiff's counsel's second letter dated January 8, 2016. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 01/08/2016) 01/12/2016 295 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 291 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from John V. Golaszewski, Esq. dated January 8, 2016 re: Request for Conference. ENDORSEMENT: Application denied without prejudice to renewal once the Court rules on objections to my Feb. 5, 2015 Report and Recommendation. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 1/11/2016) (adc) (Entered: 01/12/2016) 01/20/2016 296 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Maria Louisa Bianco on behalf of Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Keo-Sung Liu. (Bianco, Maria Louisa) (Entered: 01/20/2016) 01/20/2016 297 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Milo Silberstein on behalf of Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Keo-Sung Liu. (Silberstein, Milo) (Entered: 01/20/2016) 01/22/2016 298 FIRST LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Hugh H. Mo dated January 22, 2016 re: Substitution of Counsel. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 01/22/2016) 01/27/2016 299 CONSENT ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY: Notice is hereby given that, subject to approval by the court, Kao-Sung Liu and Gina Liu substitutes Milo Silbertstein, Dealy Silberstein Braverman, LLP, State Bar No. 2814382 as counsel of record in place of The Law Firm of Hugh H. Mo, P.C. Attorney Pedro Medina, Jr and Hugh Hu Mo terminated. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 1/27/2016) (mro) (Entered: 01/28/2016) 02/09/2016 300 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER for 215 Report and Recommendation. The Court ADOPTS the RR in its entirety. For the reasons stated above, the Court accepts in full Magistrate Judge Francis' Report and Recommendation, and rejects Plaintiff's objections pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff's request for voluntary dismissal without prejudice is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to reopen the case. Case reopened. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/9/2016) (kko) (Entered: 02/10/2016) 02/09/2016 301 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 216 Order on Motion for Sanctions. For the reasons stated above, the Court affirms the R R to the extent that it recommends monetary sanctions, but sustains Plaintiff's objection to the imposition of joint and several liability against her counsel. Defendants shall be awarded reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees, incurred by them in scheduling and preparing for Plaintiff's deposition, in an amount to be determined by Judge Francis. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/9/2016) (kko) (Entered: 02/10/2016) 02/26/2016 302 FIRST LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Frank Maas from Hugh H. Mo dated February 26, 2016 re: Motion to Withdraw. Document filed by Hugh Hu Mo.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 02/26/2016)
个人分类: 法律|13497 次阅读|7 个评论
分享 LAO的言行与律师身份不符
热度 3 方枪枪 2016-3-2 17:56
律师这行的行规还是很严的。 LAO律师是有证律师,但他律师执照只对他所在的州有用,要拿加州执照,还得到加州考试。挺难的,我以前写过的,一个名校法学教授没考过加州执照。没有加州执照,给加州的案子进行咨询,就是无证行律,这是违反律师行规的。Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon Frank, P.C. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County 里,外州律师在加州参与调解就违规了。Spivak v. Sachs 里,加州律师给纽约客户给出离婚建议也违规了。虽然LAO强调过其提供的某些是法律见解,但这不由他说了算,最终由律师协会根据内容进行判断,总之,如果没有加州执照,在这几起网络官司上的有些言论,可能是不妥的。 错误的法律建议是有后果的,因为律师职业要有基本的专业知识。桑兰案中的海明就惹麻烦了。LAO给 iMan、彼岸网 等提了不少看法。 在翰山侵权问题上,LAO说了这么一句话:”让翰山过来介绍一下岳博士的控告内容,我一定尽力,争取把他的指控干掉。”读者会怎么理解?首先你有加州执照吗?其次你没有加州执照,要尽力把他的指控干掉,这是一名律师能够轻易说的吗?要知道翰山案还涉及诽谤。 然后LAO先是认为岳东晓可能没有版权。然后说“版权法上有个辩护是'无辜侵权者' (innocent infringer),基本含义是,如果一个人没有原因知道侵权的作品是受版权保护,那么法律要求法官把损失减低为不少于$200...我很难相信他为了$700 或$200 去启动一个诉讼官司。" 在读者看来,这起到了给翰山打气的作用。但是,LAO律师发表这番言论时可以说连岳东晓的诉状都还没看到。且不说该律师有没有加州执业资格,即使有执业资格这种说法从一个律师口里说出来也是不负责任的。现在联邦法官写了8页的裁决确定EMAIL传票有效。翰山如果被人误导采取错误的对策,找谁呢? 在杨文斌是不是 iMan 的事情上,LAO发表评论说原告必须证明 “iman - 扬”,杨才是被告。还找了O’Connell v. Jacobs。那个案子我看了下,根本不是这么回事。是审判完了,被告已经被审了,判决说没有证据证明是被告干的。IMAN现在的作为也和LAO律师的评论看起来一致,在加州法院躲猫猫,岳东晓却说他撒谎了,到时万一iMan伪证成立, 怎么说? 在传票问题上,LAO也说“整个《海牙公约》程序非常严格和繁琐,如果在送件过程中有任何不按照公约规定的要求,送件将无效”,这话没错,但是,无疑让读者认为基本上岳达不到送达的目的,假如最后真的用挂号信就可以了。又怎么说? 一个专业的律师怎么会在网上如此不负责任的发言? 头脑清楚点的都知道,他可能和我们一样就是看热闹的,况且他对岳本来就有看法,态度上几呼失态。 你们打得越热闹,大家可能看得越起劲。 他是什么量级他也说了,令人好笑的是他说他和“东晓鼠太郎”这种ID是一个量级的。 日前,mayimayi网友多次在相关博客下留言提到翰山案。这是一位很善良很有正义感的网友,既知道什么对什么不对,又希望朋友不要因此陷入官司。 翰山网友与我不熟,N年来,我们在网上互相回贴可能不超过十条。岳东晓是2014年说要告翰山的,当时大家只当一个玩笑看。直到去年才告了他。 翰山也许应该和自己比较真诚的朋友去商量一下怎么应对。
2119 次阅读|8 个评论
分享 发生空难后对律师的规定
热度 6 方枪枪 2016-1-26 09:45
美国法律规定,飞机发生空难后45天律师才能主动联系家属。 这个法律的立法背景是什么呢? 由于 侵权官司都是高额官司, 很多律师代希望代理,因此他们会主动前来,甚至在葬礼上纠缠,使家属在悲痛的时候还烦不胜烦。为了制止这种行为,美国国会在1996年通过了30天禁止律师去主动联系家属的条款,后来又在2000年改为45天。但这并不意味着家属不能在45天内主动寻找律师。 美国关于侵权方面,特别是空难甚至其它事故的律师,基本上多采取提成的方式,打不赢不拿钱,但打赢了可能会拿走赔偿额的30%以上。空难的官司,过失容易证明,航空公司也有钱,所以这类案子他们非常青睐。 这种规定违不违反律师的言论自由? 联邦法律为什么特别关照空难受害者家属?这两个问题可以留给喜欢思考的同学去思考了。
4065 次阅读|3 个评论
分享 我的民事案件传票送达
热度 4 light 2015-10-2 21:34
我的民事案件传票送达一共四次, 我想第一二次送到被告有周折被告躲猫猫结果多收我一次钱。 最后判我赢。 现在要执行又送两次传票, 因为被告有一个美国名字有一个汉语拼音名字, 判决写的是美国名字, 大概律师要送两个名字又收我两份钱。
6656 次阅读|18 个评论
分享 我给夜夜城律师的回信
热度 2 岳东晓 2015-8-20 10:45
夜城律师来信: http://www.zhenzhubay.com/home.php?mod=spaceuid=2do=blogid=30374 保留证据是法律义务。我的回信引用了加州最高法院的一个案例,该案中原告在起诉前4个月要求被告保留证据,但被告销毁了证据。法院虽然裁定销毁证据本身不能构成民事 tort,但有其他的惩罚。其中有一句话相当有洞察力。法院说:【 "little motivation for intentional spoliation exists when the third party is wholly divorced from the litigation】,也就是说如果第三者与诉讼没有直接关系的话,一般来说不会有刻意销毁证据的动机。因此,法院说:【“ if the third party spoliator is acting at the behest of a party, a negative inference may be drawn against that party." 】如果第三者在诉讼一方的鼓动下销毁证据,那么可以对该诉讼人做出负面推断。 August 19, 2015 Wei Zhong Associate Attorney at Chen Lee's Law Office 1455 Response Road STE 120 Sacramento , CA 95815 Via fax: ( 916) 880-5601 Dear Ms. Zhong, Thank you for confirming your firm's representation of yeyeclub.com ("Yeyeclub"). My first email to Yeyeclub clearly identified the information requested for preservation (not yet for production) as "malicious and defamatory attacks against me personally". This is sufficiently specific. You know what attacks are when you see them. Also, my letter to you dating August 18 further stated that "I may have to institute defamation claims against personally." Both a party and a non-party have a legal duty to preserve evidence. A party's intentional destruction of evidence may result in terminating sanctions. As to a non-party, in Temple Community Hosp. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles , 20 Cal.4th 464, 84 Cal.Rptr.2d 852, 976 P.2d 223 (1999), our Supreme Court recognized that " hird party spoliation of evidence is analogous to perjury by a witness" and " criminal sanction remains available under Penal Code section 135, as are disciplinary sanctions against attorneys who may be involved in spoliation." The Court is also mindful that "little motivation for intentional spoliation exists when the third party is wholly divorced from the litigation ... if the third party spoliator is acting at the behest of a party, a negative inference may be drawn against that party." Id. To claim undue burden in preserving the website data is curious, as all Yeyeclub needs to do is to run a simple backup command. Given the clear legal duty to preserve, it would seem wiser for your client to act out of an abundance of caution. Sincerely, Dongxiao Yue, Ph.D. 2777 Alvarado Str, Ste C San Leandro , Ca 94577 XXXXXXXXXXXXX
个人分类: 法律|8421 次阅读|3 个评论
分享 夜夜城律师的回信
岳东晓 2015-8-20 09:06
这是今天(8/19) 下午5点左右收到的。我的回应参见: http://www.zhenzhubay.com/home.php?mod=spaceuid=2do=blogid=30374 下面文字是OCR的结果,准确率不是100% August 18,2015 CHENLE.E A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 1455 Response Rood, Suite 120, Sacramento CA 95815 office 936.554.8700 • Fox 916.880.560:1. • www.chenle.law.com Via Facsimile and First Glass Mail Dongxiao Yue 2777 Alvarado St., Ste C San Leandro, CA 94577 Re: Yeyeclub.com Dear Mr. Yue, This office has been retained In order to respond to your electronic mail to the website, yeyeclub.com, In which you made a request for the preservation of certain "posted content, IF addresses, email address and database records." We are also In :receipt of your letter dated August 18, 2015. Neither of these communications were accompanied by a court issued subpoena. We are sorry to inform you that Yeyeclub is unable to comply with your request at this time. As of the date of this letter, Yeyeclub.com is neither aware of any pending litigation for which it is a party nor has It been served with subpoena for any electronic data and as such Yeyeclub currently bas no legal obligation to Incur costs to preserve its electronic data. Furthermore, Yeyeclub is simply unable to accommodate your request. Your request as phrased In your August 15 electronic-mail was vague, ambiguous, Incomprehensible and overbroad. Your e-mail Indicates that litigation is anticipated against "several users" of the Yeyec!ub website and requests that "relevant Infonnation" relating to such be preserved. However, there was no specific and identifYing infowation to that regard. It is not reasonably ascertainable as to which useJ:(s) you request was directed .. To comply with such request, even if ascertainable, would be time consuming and an undue burden on a non-party. Further, relevance of evidence or potential evidence is a legal conclusion. There is simply no basis for Yeyec1ub to make this detennlne on wbether certain electronic data mayor may not be "relevant" for speculated future litigation. To make this detennlnation would be pure conjecture. Should you wish to pursuit this matter further, please provide case information, specific and reasonably ascertainable description of the electronic data you are seeking to protect, duration of the requested bold and fonnat infonnation. Yeyeclub is requesting that the party issuing the subpoena or seeking the hold to provide reimbursement for any costs associated with their request. We look forward to working with you to resolve this matter. Wei Zhong
个人分类: 法律|7739 次阅读|0 个评论
分享 网教:给杨文彬讲解中美法律的不同
热度 3 岳东晓 2015-7-12 06:37
北美中国移民往往带着中国传统封建时代的印记,不明白中西司法系统的区别,往往拿中国的衙门去往美国的法院上套。这就出问题了。 有次有一个人给我看一法庭的命令,说这个命令的全部内容就是对方律师写的,法官只在上面签了个字。这人气愤地说道: (美国)法院又不是对方家开的,他们说了不算。 其实,法官这么做完全可能是对的。美国法院是对抗性的。也就是诉讼双方根据法律与规则对抗,法官基本是一个被动的裁判角色,不会主动去做什么事情。基本的程序是,一方说A,令一方B,法官的任务是判断(1)谁符合程序;(2)谁更有道理。假如对方提出个什么说法,你没有反应,对方自然就赢了。 美国法官的主动性远远低于足球裁判。足球比赛中谁犯了规,裁判会主动吹哨子。但美国法院,对方如果违规,你必须自己去指出来。否则的话,你这个反对权可能就永久放弃了。 中国人思维不是这样,他们脑子里政府、法院应该是皇帝、包青天的角色,会主动去进行调查、分析,自己只要击鼓鸣冤即可。 杨文彬在彼岸网向人提问到,是否可以不理睬加州法院的传唤,到时再在加拿大安大略法院抗拒加州法院的管辖权? 如果是这样,杨就处于相当被动的地步了。 对我的提醒,杨文彬可能会说,你真是个活雷锋啊。 这又是中国式思维,总是试图对一件事情进行道德性的揣测,而不是从客观角度来分析。 我也许有好为人师的缺点,但是这个讲解却是为了证明我给了杨文彬公平的通知 (fair notice),堂堂正正,而不是试图打伏击,企图 ambush 。在美国法庭上企图伏击对方是 highly prejudicial 的事情,对方会嚷嚷,法官也会认为你做法不公平。珍珠港式偷袭是美国人反感的。 有了给杨文彬的提醒,到了法庭上,我可以告诉法官,你看,我把后果都写得这么清楚,杨文彬也多次声明要来加州法院应诉与反诉,现在他不来,明显是畏惧正义,对他作出不利的裁决非常正当,其情节恶劣,应与严惩,也算 set an example for the society。同理,这个论证拿到加拿大法院也很有说服力。杨文彬都无法装天真,说草民无知请求原谅了。
个人分类: 法律|8155 次阅读|2 个评论
分享 法教: 藐视法庭,可以坐牢
热度 4 岳东晓 2015-6-14 13:19
【未经书面许可、不得转载,违者必究】 律师喜欢讲自己打官司的故事,我有个律师朋友讲起一件事情,很有教育意义:有个政府官员为了竞选连任,做出了一些迎合选民的举动,一法官下了一道禁令,不允许他继续,他却在收到禁令后当场将禁令撕毁。这是典型的藐视法庭,于是他被关进监狱。我这位律师朋友为他申诉,好像取得了部分成功。听罢故事,我问道,此人后来选上没? 律师说道,选上了,他以坐牢的代价赢得了选民的爱戴,这是他算好的。 沉吟半刻,律师补充道,不过他虽然在监狱里只待了几天就出来了,却被其他犯人虐待,染上了某种不治之病。 所以啊,法治社会什么时候都不要把法院当儿戏。法院本来是讲理的地方,法官不像行政分支,手里没有武器,但如果谁不听法院的指令,法院就可以说你藐视法庭。藐视法庭又分民事藐视与刑事藐视。具体的区别我就不多说了。但有一点值得注意,这个民事藐视的威力很大,法院可以无限制将藐视者关押,都不需要经过审判。有个美国律师已经因为民事藐视坐了几十年牢了。这个故事我以前写过的。 最近我通过法院给某些网站发出了传票,要求交出若干人等的信息,以便将其绳之以法。接到传票者应该仔细阅读上面的黑体警告字眼。 这些网主如果不依据法院指令按时交出数据,本人将启动 contempt proceeding 。 【未经书面许可、不得转载,违者必究】
5318 次阅读|10 个评论
分享 徐律师反击,莫虎撤回 RULE 11 制裁动议
热度 2 岳东晓 2015-3-31 08:20
怎么了? 下面徐律师给法院的信,我还没看,好奇读者可自行阅读并给出总结 桑兰律师给法院的信 02/18/2015 219 SECOND MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 02/18/2015) 02/18/2015 220 DECLARATION of Kao-Sung Liu in Support re: 219 SECOND MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 .. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit M)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 02/18/2015) 02/18/2015 221 FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 219 SECOND MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 . . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 02/18/2015) 02/18/2015 222 DECLARATION of Hugh H. Mo in Support re: 219 SECOND MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 .. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 1), # 9 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 2), # 10 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 3), # 11 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 4), # 12 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 5), # 13 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 6), # 14 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 7), # 15 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 8), # 16 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 9), # 17 Exhibit Exhibit H (Part 10), # 18 Exhibit Exhibit I, # 19 Exhibit Exhibit J, # 20 Exhibit Exhibit K, # 21 Exhibit Exhibit L)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 02/18/2015) 02/19/2015 223 OBJECTION to 215 Report and Recommendations with incorporated Memorandum of Law Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 02/19/2015) 02/19/2015 224 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 216 Order on Motion for Sanctions, . Document filed by Sang Lan.(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 02/19/2015) 02/19/2015 225 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 224 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 216 Order on Motion for Sanctions, . . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 02/19/2015) 02/23/2015 226 FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 224 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 216 Order on Motion for Sanctions, . . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Appendix A, # 2 Appendix Appendix B)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 02/23/2015) 02/24/2015 227 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider served on X. Bing Xu on February 24, 2015. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 02/24/2015) 02/26/2015 228 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Vincent Golaszewski on behalf of Sang Lan. (Golaszewski, John) (Entered: 02/26/2015) 02/26/2015 229 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Allan Steven Schiller on behalf of Sang Lan. (Schiller, Allan) (Entered: 02/26/2015) 02/26/2015 230 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Brian Patrick Fredericks on behalf of Sang Lan. (Fredericks, Brian) (Entered: 02/26/2015) 02/27/2015 231 ORDER denying 224 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff has failed to identify any controlling case law or factual information on the record that the Court overlooked. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis)(Text Only Order) (Francis, James) (Entered: 02/27/2015) 02/27/2015 232 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Hugh H. Mo dated February 27, 2015 re: Response to Plaintiff's counsel's letter dated February 26, 2015. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu.(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 02/27/2015) 02/27/2015 233 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from X. Bing Xu, and Thomas L. Johnson dated 2/26/2015 re: Counsel request a conference, either in person or via telephone, with the Court such that we may discuss outstanding discovery, and set a new discovery timeline. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff shall respond to the fee affidavit by March 13, 2015, and defendants shall reply by March 20, 2015. Plaintiff has filed an objection to the Report Recommendation that recommended denial of the motion to dismiss without prejudice. It would be premature to set any further discovery schedule until the objection is ruled upon. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 2/27/2015) (tn) (Entered: 02/27/2015) 03/03/2015 234 FIRST RESPONSE re: 223 Objection to Report and Recommendations . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 03/03/2015) 03/03/2015 235 DECLARATION of Hugh H. Mo re: 234 Response, 223 Objection to Report and Recommendations . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 03/03/2015) 03/04/2015 236 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from X. Bing Xn dated 3/4/2015 re: Counsel requests that the Court grant the request for a 10 day, or any brief and reasonable extension the Court deems necessary and appropriate, to respond to Defendant's Rule 11 motion. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff's Application is hereby granted. Plaintiff shall respond Defendants Rule 11 Motion on or before 3/20/15; Defendant shall file their reply on or before 3/27/15. Set Deadlines/Hearing as to 219 SECOND MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 : Responses due by 3/20/2015, Replies due by 3/27/2015. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 3/4/2015) (tn) Modified on 3/4/2015 (tn). (Entered: 03/04/2015) 03/11/2015 237 Objection re: 216 Order on Motion for Sanctions, . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 03/11/2015) 03/13/2015 238 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: 206 FIRST MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 37 . objection to refiled doc 217 . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Bing Xu, Esquire, # 2 Exhibit A1 summary, # 3 Exhibit A2 140717 bill, # 4 Exhibit A3 141030 bill)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 03/13/2015) 03/13/2015 239 DECLARATION of Bing Xu, Esquire in Opposition re: 206 FIRST MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 37 .. Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A1 Summary, # 2 Exhibit A2 140717 bill, # 3 Exhibit A3 141030 bill, # 4 Exhibit A4 141124 bill)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 03/13/2015) 03/20/2015 240 FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support of Defendants' Application for Attorneys Fees and Costs . Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Mo, Hugh) (Entered: 03/20/2015) 03/20/2015 241 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 219 SECOND MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 . . Document filed by Sang Lan. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Sang Lan Decl. in support, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C)(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 03/20/2015) 03/24/2015 242 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Motion re: 219 SECOND MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 .. Document filed by Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(individually), Gina Hiu-Hung Liu(as trustees or managers of Goodwill For Sang Lan Fund), Hugh Hu Mo, Keo-Sung Liu. (Medina, Pedro) (Entered: 03/24/2015) 03/25/2015 243 ORDER withdrawing 219 Motion for Sanctions. Defendants have withdrawn the motion without prejudice to submitting a subsequent application for sanctions. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis)(Text Only Order) (Francis, James) (Entered: 03/25/2015) 03/25/2015 244 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV from Bing Xu, Esquire and Thomas Johnson, Esquire dated 3/25/2015 re: Def. Notice of Withdrawal of Rule 11 Motion. Document filed by Sang Lan.(Xu, X. Bing) (Entered: 03/25/2015) 看了一下徐律师的信,原来 莫虎把Safe harbor letter 发给了法庭与新华社,却没有给徐律师。 如果莫虎再补发,而且说的有道理,则原告方又可以修改状纸,再次循环。
个人分类: 法律|7241 次阅读|6 个评论
分享 回应 lawandorder 律师
热度 2 岳东晓 2014-12-16 09:10
lawandorder 律师您好, 彼岸网友们不少是高学历,有的还是理工科,对简单的中英文阅读都应该不存在太大的问题、逻辑能力也不错,你的错误他们理应能够看出来,但他们似乎像小学生一样把你当成老师一样恭敬,这就可能使他们有一定的盲目、盲从。虚心好学的他们被你这老师误导也不好。所以,下面我就你的一些观点做简单的说明。 1) 我写的【“Han 先生本人继续散布大量诽谤性、挑衅性、攻击性言论,本人再次呼吁 Han 先生停止攻击、诽谤,而是等待法律的裁断。”】 如何理解? 有点逻辑能力的读者都应该看出,从我的这段话中无法推出如果【翰停止】这些做法【就不告了】的结论或者暗示。我仅仅是请求 Han 先生停止在网上的这些恶意的、搞得乌烟瘴气的做法,等待相关案件的依法进行。 您写道【如果翰有任何攻击性言论,如果情节严重,他还可以举报警方,请求对翰进行刑事调查。】 我的【攻击性言论】一词,并非指涉嫌刑事犯罪的言论。这一点,我想读者也都应该理解。 2) 您写到:【由于翰的以上行为,岳要启动本来不想启动的侵权诉讼。反向推理,如果岳本人自己的侵权案有力度或有赔偿价值,他一定会启动,也不会和翰的行为表现性质连在一起。】 先不论你对本人文字的理解错误,光看这个所谓“反向推理”就完全没有逻辑。你可以尝试从你的第一句反向推出第二句。 Hanshan 的诽谤性言论是在侵权事件中针对侵权作品及作者产生的,联邦法院对此应该具有 supplemental jurisdiction,这个概念你在读书时应该背诵过,但可能要运用起来就糊涂了。建议复习思考一下。 另外,在侵权过程中的言论与版权案很可能有关,因为这些言论也许能证明侵权者的意图及对侵权行为的态度,而不是像你认为的那样,侵权案中的诽谤【和版权法没有任何关系】。这一点,我先只点到这。你如果不明白,我可以拨冗继续阐述。本人一向是很 open 的。 3)你写到:【他说已经搞到翰山真实姓名,但“为了减少不必要的法律程序,将进一步核实相关信息。” -- 后面我理解他的含义,即,指控匿名被告和实名被告的法律程序上有不同程序要求,首先要满足法律程序要求请求法院下令传票ISP提供注册人的真实信息。但是,翰的网站是自己的网站,诉状中直接指控网站一石两鸟,程序上的担心也没有必要。】 你的阅读理解力、法律判断继续成问题。首先,我所说的【进一步核实】包括对其姓名的核实,对其姓名只是【基本确定】,而不是完全确定。其次,我的起诉书(draft)中当然包括网站,但起诉网站丝毫不能简化程序,Hanshan 网并没有公开的联系地址,即使起诉网站,我还是得经过一个获取其地址的程序才能 serve process。 4)我在通告中写的是【被侵犯版权者可以要求 "statutory damages" 或者 "actual damages and profits" (17 U.S. Code § 504), 以及 injunctive relief (17 U.S. Code § 502), 并要求被告支付 costs and attorneys fees (17 U.S. Code § 505 ).】 “可以要求”的意思是 "may request“或者 “may demand",根本没有说被告必须支付律师费。你将我的文字为理解为被告必须支付律师费完全不合逻辑也显示你法律概念不清。如果是必须支付,一般应该是说输的一方必须支付,而不光是被告。 至于版权案中 prevailing party 是否能成功要求对方支付律师费,这有一系列的判断要素,而不是随意的。我在知识产权方面打过几场官司,而我也可以基本判定你完全没有这个经验。曾有一名被告知识产权律师在法庭上说,拿知识产权律师跟普通律师比,那是苹果跟橙子的比较。话虽狂妄,但也不是完全无理。 5)天香公主提出的律师费问题,我看倒是颇有见地,不愧是理科思维,阅读理解能力、逻辑能力就是强些。 天香公主写道【岳东晓说的"要求被告支付 costs and attorneys fees",我倒是觉得这对他来讲是个两难命题。自己打官司吧,花钱少但也没法要求对方付律师费了。请律师打官司吧,那万一从对方那要不回律师费呢?】 首先,【万一从对方那要不回律师费呢】一句说明天香公主应该看懂了什么叫”要求“。"要求”是不一定能够满足的。天香公主明白,我的文字表明原告不一定能从对方那拿到律师费,这包括对方没钱或者成功逃脱的情况,但更包括法院不判对方赔律师费的情况。 其次,天香的问题也当然是我会考虑的问题。但一个案子自己上还是找律师,诉讼人完全可以根据情况进行应变,而不是说自己上就不能再找律师了。通告也只是列出相关法律指出诉讼双方可能承担的经济责任,而不是在宣告必将提出的法律诉求。 至于你给公主的回答,如前所述,基本不靠谱。 6)也许您还有其他的观点,我没有看到,但如果您提示我,我可以拨冗解答。另外,您如果为 Hanshan 的辩护做出过什么承诺,希望到时您能够履行这个承诺,而不是像某些匿名ID一样,遇到事情就销声匿迹了。 YDX
个人分类: 法律|9718 次阅读|9 个评论
分享 桑兰案进展:被告称诬告
热度 3 岳东晓 2014-9-10 12:00
刚才听传新华社报道了桑兰案的进展,我下载了被告律师给桑兰律师的一封警告信,在信中,被告律师称桑兰没有证据支持其控告,必须立刻撤诉。 特别令人惊奇的是,桑兰指控被告诽谤一条非常具体,但现在莫虎称桑兰拿不出证据。在起诉书中,桑兰称被告在网上发表了(从英文翻译)“桑兰太懒,找不到工作“, ”桑兰太懒,可以自己小便,却不这么做..."等法官认为可能构成诽谤的言辞,如果说这些是桑兰编造,确实难以想象。但莫虎在给桑兰律师的信中写道 【我们已经不是在诉讼初期,取证阶段已经结束,而原告没有出示一份博客或者文件显示含有这些被指为诽谤的言论...】 莫虎结论,原告或者没有证据,或者指控是完全捏造。 莫虎的结论从法律角度看似乎过于草率。证明被告诽谤并不一定需要文件证据。完全可能发生被告发表了诽谤性内容并有很多人看到,但事后被告做了删除处理,而原告没有存档的情况。在这种情况下,如果有人证明看到过被告发表这样的文字,也完全构成证据。证人在哪?别的不说,海明应该就是证人。这个指控是他提出的,当时他正在网上为桑兰案混战,应该是看到了什么。另外,诽谤并不需要说得很明白,只要意思影射就可能构成毁谤。 莫虎给桑兰律师信参见链接: sang-lan-192.pdf
个人分类: 法律|9303 次阅读|0 个评论
分享 某律师被征召陪审团后......
热度 16 宜修 2014-2-20 07:05
某律师被征召陪审团后......
某律师被征召去陪审团后 ..... 宜修 O扒皮今天应招去了陪审团,去行使公民的权利并履行公民的义务。不由得俺想起 某律师曾经给我讲过的一个他当年接到去陪审团服务的传票后发生的故事。 那天,他在陪审团第一圈、第二圈的随机抽签中双双入选后,到了单独面试的时候,法院甄试陪审员的工作人员问他有没有丢车的经历。 他没有直接回答,而是掏出一大串钥匙,指着其中一把说: “ 这是我丢的第一辆车的钥匙。那是我平生有的第一辆车。 ” 然后,又指着另一把钥匙说:“这是我丢的另一辆车的钥匙......” ......(老岳:请你先不要跟贴) 二零一四年二月十九日晚录
个人分类: 移民生活|12775 次阅读|56 个评论
分享 美国著名律师:薄熙来案件的可能结果、历史意义和深远影响(ZT) ...
热度 4 他乡异客 2013-9-17 20:49
薄熙来案件的可能结果、历史意义和深远影响 Brady V. Maryland    绪言:   中共在拒绝通过整体制度变革消除制度性腐败的同时,代之以选择性打击,歧视性定罪成例陋俗,一路走来;先是陈希同,接着成克杰,再就是陈良宇,党规帮法铁轮过处,无往而不利。而大多数看热闹的民众,廉价的喝彩之声绝对压倒理性的批评,执政党即使明知自己有屁股不干净的诟病,在前面这些案例中似乎也占净话语权的相对强势的便宜。如今,沿用老思维,老套路来处理薄熙来案件,却踢到了铁板。最后,无论是坐在审判席位上的,还是高踞审判席位后的,恐怕都会发现,审判薄熙来得不偿失。法治精神,程序公正,民意,公共道德制高点,话语权似乎统统不在掌握这个个案生杀大权的权势者手里。剩下的只是赤裸裸的强暴和蛮横。   对薄熙来案件的任何不当处置,只能是加深加剧中国各大政治利益板块间裂痕,加速动荡的到来。而一旦这种危机到了总爆发时其实眼下的领导集团对此并无万全的应对良策。问计于基辛格,问计于世界银行,恐怕也是无济于事。   其实,对薄熙来案件的这种在难产钝痛中挣扎不已的困扰,是中共统治集团缺乏面对未来挑战,而深陷于狭隘的派别利益纷争禁锢不愿超越,拒绝受领拥抱一个广角的全新的视野的悲剧。在这里,耶稣基督赐给的智慧是,新醸的酒,不能再用旧皮袋来装载了。   审判薄熙来,不能说全无新意。当局至少在挣扎着尝试着小步前进,部分承诺透明和公开试验。用微博来部分传递在可以控制范围内的庭审过程。虽然这种庭审的质量还不敢恭维。但就是开这么一小缝隙的窗户,马上发生了问题。薄熙来和一干证人纷纷翻供的情况大量暴露在外部世界。难题一个接着一个出现。不能不给反对改革的保守势力以封杀任何通向法治文明的缺口的借口。就像三十年前中共党内试行今天海外学者冯胜平先生提出的让一部分人先民主起来的迟到30年的局部改良方案:结果最先跌倒在地,成为第一批部分民主实验的殉道者的,恰恰是来自最权高位重家庭的人士,其中不乏一代卓越的佼佼者:朱厚泽,邓朴方,陈元等等。没有人研究过,也没有统计数字表明,这些局部发生的遭到扭曲的,可能不尽公平的挫折对中国日后民主进程的微妙影响,但笔者希望以培植全民族福祉,而非派别帮会利益,为己任,高踞庙堂的衮衮诸公,不要以个人个案的得失作为进退决策的依凭。除了坚定不移地选择走宪政法治的道路,实在看不出中共面前还会有更好的选项用来自救救人。唯此,才能抢占人类事务的巅峰,赢得纵观全局的全新视野。有了这种自许和自信,才有可能放手让法官们本着人类良知法律精神和专业操守去推行正义。这样一种建立在智慧和自信基础上的潇洒,或许是中华民族赢得一个新世界的开端。   正是在这个意义上,也仅仅是在这个意义上,深入探讨薄熙来案件审判才有价值。   1.从技术层面分析,应该依法宣告薄熙来无罪或者最多只是犯了指控范围以内的轻罪   在薄熙来案审判秀粉墨登场之前,笔者在东西南北网发文预告,本案“一不三没有”。当济南所谓的人民法院一反常例,公然以微博部分直播庭审过程,其间出现了所谓薄熙来翻供的“戏剧性”场面,似乎给观众一些意外的惊喜,其实这是早在当局的盘算预测之中,根本没有所谓的“意外”发生。当局是暂时的赢家,即使薄熙来翻供了,徐明翻供了:首先,当局把一场严肃的政治博弈成功地变成了一场事关区区500万或者两千万人民币的一场细枝末节的争辩。把全中国人民的眼球乃至全世界关注中国发展的人士的注意力,成功地吸引到了一堆芝麻,一地鸡毛上去,彻底剥夺了被告借用审判平台的,说出自己真正想向公众说出自己要说的话的最后机会。在这个意义上,当局成功了,薄熙来还是上当了。钻进了当局替他设置的圈套。只要薄熙来自己放弃了在公共道德和话语权方面和当局对抗的主导权,他就跳进了`陷阱,就必定成为当局案板上的鱼肉,生死与夺就必然操之于人手。以薄熙来的处境,他唯一求生的希望,是把自己置之死地而后生。做好当烈士的准备,放手一搏,利用最后的发言平台,发出鱼死网破的政治宣言,指出这种针对他的毁誉性政治审判没有合法性可言,不过是欲加之罪,何患无辞而已。号召结束这种政治迫害的制度。如此一来,这原先布置好的棋局就乱套了,当局要是敢冒天下之大不讳,来判薄熙来死刑,制造一个烈士,一面众望所归的旗帜,那就绝对得不偿失了。   在上述大前提下,我们再来看看薄熙来案的得失:   首先我们看到的是,即使指控薄熙来贪渎的东拉西扯,似是而非的证据统统属实,也只能证明薄熙来在中共统治集团内,比较而言,实在是一个难得一见的“清官”。在中共的体制内,为官比较清廉是极为危险的。这种反常的清廉,往往意味着清廉人士保藏政治野心和与周边环境这种制度性腐败的次文化氛围格格不入。例如福建省的防弹衣县委书记“腐败”案就是例证。   用来指控薄熙来这样一个政治局委员,“党和国家领导人”,封疆大吏的所谓“贪渎”指控不过区区300多万美金,远远低于一个当今中共乡长县长级官员的平均贪渎水准。根据中共退休广东省长黄华华先生揭露,仅仅广东一省,省市一级官员不明财产过亿的亿万富豪家庭有2300户,占了这类官员编制的几乎100%。这一群体占有和控制全省房地产市场70%,金融保险市场60%。到了薄熙来的官位层次,即使是被公开揭露,确切有据的类似温家宝家庭来路不明的27亿美金这样的天文数字(不完全统计),也不算过分,当不上当代和紳的。拿冠军资格更是免谈。因此,即使把当局把张冠李戴,胡乱拼凑的屎盆子全部扣到薄熙来头上,最后只能说明薄熙来比较而言确实是一个“清官”。至于说到薄熙来当官可能给当律师的太太谷开来律师事务所带来生意兴隆的局面,谷开来或许多赚了一些律师费,这恐怕是当今乃至以往,或许还包括将来全世界各国的潜规则,很难和薄熙来个人贪渎扯上法律层面的因果关系。薄熙来的保险箱里面或许有一些多出于他本人薪水收入的现金,这能证明薄熙来贪渎吗?一般公认,中共党内历史上清廉者不过于故元帅林彪。此人在逃亡前也带着若干金条美金呢。30多年前的中共当局虽然一样反人类,但在公共道德层面还比较正派,信实一些,因此,审判“林彪反革命集团”时没见给林彪扣一个“贪渎”的屎盆子。尽管彼时坐在原告席为上的衮衮诸公要比现在干净得多。悖谬在于,被中共当局用来当作为“大老虎“贪官惩治的,没有一个不是比较而言的“清官”,因此,没有一个不是冤案。从陈希同,陈良宇到成克杰案。当然,薄熙来案在技术性层面,如果这种审判不能摆脱政治干预操控的困局,这依然会是一场失败的审判,是司法史上的又一块耻辱碑。再一次显示法治和程序正义在中国根本不存在。   2.程序正义和证据问题   学法律的人士的职业病是认准一个死理:当是非与程序发生冲突时,程序优先考量。作为一个具有意识形态好恶倾向的个人,你可以喜欢薄熙来和他所做的,或客观上造成的一切,你也可以不喜欢,甚至严厉批评薄熙来和他所做的,或客观上造成的一切。但讲到程序正义,你似乎不应该因为不喜欢他和他造就的一切而希望剥夺他程序上的公平和正义。在此前提下我们来看本案审判过程中出现的程序问题和证据问题,及其对全案后果的影响。   首先,关键证人徐明的当庭翻供,在被告本人的质证中`做出对被告有利的证词。如果尊重法治精神,本来应该导致全案流审。至少薄熙来的辩护律师应该立即临时动议暂停审判过程,全案应该发回补充调查。因为事关两千万人民币,全案的大头,的关键证据链经不起质证,发生断裂。因此,案件最重要的证据基础崩溃了。本案最有杀伤力的证据是谷开来指证薄熙来间接“收取“价值300万美金以上位于法国尼斯的豪宅,和唐霄林的直接行贿。这里的问题是:谷开来的书面证词,未经当庭质证,只能当成道听途说(inadmissible hearsay),不应该入证。因此没有证据效力,由此就不能构成定罪依据。   进而言之,即使谷开来到庭质证,此人的证词也不能作为定罪证据。这并非仅仅应为谷开来受遭到指使的吊奴内贼王立军的陷害而变得精神失常。精神失常者并非完全不具备指证能力。但控方有责任向法庭提供精神科专家诊断,证明该证人在当时具备就本案有关内容提供证词的清醒的神志和意识。但是更重要的是:谷开来在薄熙来案件中不具备充当入罪薄熙来的证人资格:因为伤害性证人谷开来是刑事被告薄熙来的合法配偶。纵观文明各国刑事诉讼法,合法配偶在刑事诉讼程序中不具备对配偶被告作伤害性指证的权利能力,除非其被告配偶自动放弃禁止此类证据的特权。(法律一般不完全禁止此类配偶的举证行为能力。配偶如果一定要陷害自己的丈夫或妻子,可以在预审阶段,特别是在没有辩护律师在场的情况下提供控方或者警察想要知道的内情作为案件突破的线索。但这类口供是不能呈堂入证的,更不允许把妻子带到庭上指控丈夫犯罪。这种禁止是合理的,是基于公共政策和公共道德的要求:保护家庭,维护一个文明社会的体面。否则,把一对国家法律制度本意要保护的合法夫妻带到一个刑事审判庭来相互死咬对方,其结果只能是把任何一场严肃的审判变成一场动物园的猴戏。重演文革期间夫妻被诱导强迫进行互相检举揭发的闹剧。这种禁止规范,即使在眼下中国没有入典,薄熙来的辩护律师也应该要求排除谷开来证词进入定罪证据,以维护法律和审判的严肃性,和正当性。毕竟一个国家其法律的示范意义和司法体面要比对一个被告的定罪量刑重要得多。排除了这些入罪关键证据,还剩下多少可以依法给薄熙来定罪的证据呢?   不多了,但还是有。那就是薄熙来本人的供述证词。看了这些审判过程,本人的确对被告捏了一把汗。被告显然缺乏资质优秀的律师的有效保护。被告在几乎完全没有律师保护的情况下受到整体误导,就具体案情讲话太多,这不仅和薄熙来的公共形象和本应该努力争取获得的公众政治地位不相符合,而且一个没有受过正规系统法律训练,缺乏审判实践经验的外行,一旦被纠缠到案情的细枝末节中去,一定言多必失。   你根本不知道陷阱在哪里。(当成克杰在坦诚自己和李萍的爱情如何真挚,以至有结婚的打算时,他,一个法盲,哪里会知道他的这种真诚不仅起不到感动对手的作用,反而成了一个鸦鸦乎法庭凭以对之定下“二人共同体”认定,进而据此定下死罪的“铁证”。假如老成一口咬定和李萍的关系只是苟合而已呢?老成的所谓“铁证”离开串谋共同犯罪故意和行为要件差距甚远,也无法证明被告对完全由李萍知情,勒索,收取,占有,使用,处分的工程好处费的实际享有或实际法律地位。万一李萍爱上了,要嫁给,检控官呢?审判长呢?她能把千万嫁妆扔给成克杰。即使能,这仍不扔的权利完全操在李萍手里。仅此一端,就充分证明把李平收取并且事后直接掌握控制的工程好处费直接划拨到成克杰头上是站不住脚的。而且那位据说是检控3000案件无一失误的监控官在法庭自打嘴巴:声称退还“赃款”全有李萍完成。成克杰没有贡献.废话。这不正好证明成克杰对李萍户头上的赃款没有所有权,使用权,控制权和处分权吗?可怜成克杰脑袋掉了还不知道怎么掉的!)尤其中国这种法律环境,只要满足了莫须有,鸦鸦乎条件,例如成克杰案,典型错案,就能凭这种边缘不干不净,不清不楚,莫须有,鸦鸦乎的条件,定罪。连死罪都不需要铁证。   如果薄熙来的辩护律师真有意愿,胆略,和头脑替他的客户量身裁衣,就应该针对外部证据相对不足,严重致命缺陷的情况,应该鼓励被告以斩钉决铁的态度整体否定预审证词,因为“中纪委“在双规这种法外拘禁审讯方式根本就没有入典,属于法外私刑范畴,本质上是非法的,而且是无法无天状态。这种非法过程提取的证据,缺乏合法性支持,不能入证。虽然如此辩护,似乎不符合中国特殊国情,但它却符合被告的最高审判利益,因为它一下就打乱了当局的周密计划。因为毕竟这种违反现行宪法和现行刑事诉讼法的法外诱供,是不登大雅之堂的东西。中共当局如今在压力下要标榜审判“公正”“独立”,是很难面对要求禁止非法证据入证的要求的。但一旦被告及其律师不提出这样的要求,放任非法证据入证,只能视为被告自动放弃抗辩权利。但现在显示的情况显然是被告律师放任非法证据存在,而鼓励甚至误导被告对这些整体有害的证据作没有任何正面作用,只有祸害的点滴修补解释,而且显然放任被告任意发挥,其结果只能是越描越黑。不知道是薄熙来在故意按当局旨意和预先写就的剧本给当局放水,还是被告律师不知水深水浅,缺乏专业知识经验,或者事先就和当局串通,故意不顾当事人利益,给当局放水。(刑事辩护律师刀切豆腐两面光,故意给控方放水,以精细巧妙的方式配合控方,损害被告当事人的事例,即使在西方国家也是屡见不鲜的。)   谢天谢地,中国刑事诉讼法规定,缺乏证据链,仅凭被告自证,不能凭以定罪。因此,据此,薄熙来的贪渎指控存在致命的证据不足,就此项刑事指控,一个自称为“独立,公正”的法庭应该宣告据实宣告被告薄熙来无罪。至于薄熙来包庇夫人谷开来“杀害”海乌德犯下渎职罪,则纯属乌龙。海乌德实为王立军以及站在王立军背后的阴谋集团杀害,用来栽赃薄熙来的。就有如本人在2012年9月12日纽约茶叙激辩中国中指出:谷开来或许曾经有过杀害海乌德的妄想,但不具备杀害海乌德的行为能力。就像国会大厦纵火案中的荷兰共产党徒,精神病患者范福利特,当他提着2/3个品脱的煤油往厚达三尺的德国国会大厦水泥墙上泼去,并且为发潮的火柴点不上火而怨天尤人时,一队训练有素的纳粹特工带着专业作案工具和知识,成功点燃焚烧了德国国会大厦,这并不影响可怜的范弗利特在自己的妄想中把自己夸张成成功焚烧国会大厦的盖世英雄。   如果谷开来案件的定性量刑都破绽百出,整个一个假案,以此作为薄熙来渎职罪前提,岂非缺乏先决条件?如果谷开来果真犯下谋杀罪,那么那位报告“化作青烟,驾鹤西去”的同谋怎么没有被控以谋杀同谋呢?谁在掩盖真相呢?前提条件有致命缺陷,全案至少应该发回补充侦查。从技术层面分析,在指控范围内,薄熙来应该依法宣告无罪,或者最多获得一个轻罪判决。   3.薄熙来会获刑死刑或死缓吗?   笔者不同意主流预测,薄熙来会获刑死刑或死缓。轻判薄熙来,符合中共当前短期利益,但却是生死攸关的重大利益。此外,即使薄熙来的所有指控都能坐实,其罪名也要远远轻于对谷开来的指控。因此,笔者估计薄熙来不至于被判死缓。而应该在刑期15年到无期徒刑之间。本来就是这么回事。这是务实稳健的做法,和法治毫无关系。从法律技术层面,就其被控告的罪名而言,薄熙来应该以证据不足为由,宣告无罪。谁不明白,现在对薄的指控内容,正好是中共的死穴,相反是“清官”薄熙来的长项。另外当局显然在撒谎:新华网今晚(2013年8月23日)披露:“薄熙来要求谷开来出庭作证法官:谷开来拒绝出庭” 》消息说,因为谷开来拒绝出庭作证,只能让“公诉人宣读薄谷开来的证言节录”。证言节录,未经质证,或故意不给质证机会,根本就不是证据。谷开来一个死刑待决犯,哪有抗拒法庭出证命令的空间?但中共当局的弥天大谎的背后发生了什么:谷开来之前已经翻供。因此不能让谷开来露面让薄熙来质证。一旦让谷开来出现类似徐明当庭翻供情况,整个案子就砸了。但在美国,公诉人隐瞒对被告有利证据,例如关键证人翻供情事,一经被告律师动议,整案就会遭到法庭驳回。本律师代理的所谓人类历史上最大“毒枭”案,就是应为抓住了公诉人隐瞒两位关键证人翻供证据,而检方隐藏长达半年不报的情事而全面胜诉的。(Brady v. Maryland) 转自“红歌会”网站
个人分类: 转载|9344 次阅读|4 个评论
分享 薄熙来徐明当庭对质说漏嘴 形同认罪 徐明暴瘦(图)
热度 2 VANO 2013-8-23 18:41
律师解析:薄熙来对质已说漏了嘴,形同认罪 薄熙来的审判吸引很多人的眼球。作为一个律师,我在观察审判的过程。看起来,法庭在开始的时候显得有程序和礼貌,不慌不忙的问些身分的问题。虽然我觉得这些程序是多余的,还是觉得比法庭从前的那种武断有进步。但是当程序进行到公诉人提供证据的时候,我强烈的感到中国目前的审判程序依旧很落后。   第一,法庭仍然使用大量的“听说”材料,比如谷开来和唐肖林都没有到庭作证,公诉人呈交的是谷开来的证词,唐肖林的录音。显然法庭是在听公诉人转述这些证人说的话。这是听说(hearsay)的材料。当事人没有被被告的律师质证,转述的文字容易引起误解或不确切,概念含煳,证人的可信度无法确定。当薄熙来反驳证言和录音的时候,法庭无法确定其反驳的正当与否。   第二,被告人不当地充当律师的角色,去直接盘问当事人,并在程序中表达对证人或证言的不满。当被告人质问对方时,他很容易感情冲动,有点时候提问的方法不对。如果在美国法庭,被告人的不当表现,会给陪审团造成不当的负面印象,对其审判结果不利。事实上,被告人在庭上讲任何话都有可能产生负面影响。现在薄熙来已经开始用语言攻击徐明、唐肖林和谷开来。薄熙来还和徐明当庭对质,期间间接承认他知道徐明对谷开来和薄瓜瓜好等。这就是等于是认罪了。薄熙来的律师干什么去了?中国的刑事审判程序怎么可以让被告去自己直接去辩护和质问证人?
3189 次阅读|2 个评论
分享 法官劝告海明:这个案子打得太丑恶
热度 3 岳东晓 2013-5-22 04:56
桑兰前律师海明在签下认罪悔过书之后反悔了,于是提出动议,要求撤销那个认罪书。 法庭已经正式否定了海明的动议。法官评论到: 这个案子是我们见到过打得最丑恶的,双方律师不是在寻求争议的解决而是互相攻击。 we want to briefly note that the tactics used in this case are among the ugliest we have encountered , as the attorneys have continued to attack each other rather than resolve the underlying dispute. 法官语重心长的劝告海明:“海明把自己类比成纳粹大屠杀和强奸受害者,说委婉点,是笨拙与不当的...海明在未来的人生中应该好好反思... Hai's analogizing himself to Holocaust and rape victims in this situation is, to put it euphemistically, inept and inappropriate.. . We think it would benefit Hai to consider whether such tactics, including bombastic and clearly exaggerated assertions, seemingly unfounded recriminations, and attempts to alter agreed-upon contractual obligations, are the best way to conduct his affairs going forward. 我建议大家读读这篇英文判决,写得非常生动,把海明那可怜的摸样描述得淋漓尽致。 With the threat of sanctions looming over Hai , Hai and Defendants held a settlement conference on February 27,2012, before Magistrate Judge Francis, in which Hai and Defendants "negotiated and agreed upon all the key terms," including that Hai "pay $5,000 and execute a signed Acknowledgment of Wrongdoing to be prepared by the defendants." RR . After Hai wrote to Mo, requesting that Mo reduce the already-agreed-upon figure to $4,000, Hai signed the Stipulation. Id. at 3-4. Hai then sent a fax to Magistrate Judge Francis asking for the payment to be reduced to $4,000, but withdrew that request, allegedly under pressure. I The very next day, Hai tried to file a motion to set aside the stipulation he entered into in March to avoid the risk of those sanctions against himself. See ECF No. 99. On May 14,2012, after resolving his difficulties filing , Hai filed a motion to set aside the stipulation and order of dismissal. The accuracy of what Hai contracted to admit to is of no particular legal consequence. If Hai agreed to sign an Acknowledgment in which he stated he believed that the Earth was flat, he could not later rescind the contract because the Acknowledgement contained a falsehood. Hai should have weighed any doubts he had about the Acknowledgement's accuracy before agreeing to sign it. Instead, Hai contracted to make the Acknowledgement. Then Hai made the Acknowledgement. And now he must live with it. 参见附件: sang-lan-docket-141.pdf
5221 次阅读|0 个评论
分享 聊聊“非律师”我的看法
热度 25 蓝天绿地 2013-4-24 03:24
聊聊“非律师”我的看法,因为以前也有人提到这事。发现这里人网上互动时间很长了,有些前面发生的事我不清楚,想澄清2个问题 : 1。老岳有没有告诉过 任何人:我是律师? 2。老岳不拿律师执照,有他的考虑 . 但是他有义务告诉任何人他为什么不拿 律师 执照吗? 3. 老岳连物理博士都能拿, 要是他想拿律师执照会困难吗? 我知道我的留学生熟人里法学院毕业后马上考律师执照,立刻一个州接一个州的考下来。可是他们的英文,经验和智力不如老岳。我猜测老岳不拿律师执照是他的自愿选择。 4。 我的看法: 关键的是你到底能干什么,没大学文凭,没学士学位的人,能干出事情来的人不乏例子。 -- 假如我有律师执照,那么老岳在贺梅案上的表现会让我 惭愧 。 -- 假如我是很有经验的律师,那么老岳在贺梅案上的表现会让我 汗颜 。 -- 假如我有律师执照,我嫉妒比我干的好的人,特别这人还不去拿个执照,有 我 办的案件他还发言,我心里不爽,认为他妨碍我了,于是把矛头对准他,找个什么武器呢?'非律师'。。。 可惜,这把武器不太好使。。。
个人分类: 移民|17793 次阅读|71 个评论
分享 cannaa,您是律师吗?
热度 10 VANO 2013-3-17 10:55
就按你的逻辑,当你在网络中讨论法律维权事件时,别人问你是否是律师也是理所当然的。 包括我在内,很多网民都认为您是律师, 也请您回答一下,您是否是律师。 我个人认为您有很多观点和行为有点奇怪,如果您是律师的话,我替美国人民以及在美华人担忧啊。
9960 次阅读|46 个评论
分享 桑兰案新律师开炮了
热度 15 岳东晓 2012-10-8 17:19
桑兰案新律师开炮了
(未经本人书面许可,不得转载) 在海明签署认罪书退下之后,桑兰的新律师徐晓冰一直没有动静,乃至引人怀疑桑兰案是否已经无疾而终了。其实,这都是决战前的无线电静默。现在,桑兰及徐律师开炮了,而且是多管火箭炮齐射。 先让我们回顾一下桑兰案的之前的过程。桑兰案最初起诉了TIME WARNER,几个保险公司与几个华人被告(包括桑兰之前的监护人KS LIU,律师莫虎等)。后来,海明主动对TIME WARNER撤诉,与保险公司则达成和解。而几名华裔被告则动议法庭撤诉,要求对海明进行制裁。案子的副法官认为海明的行为已经违背美国民事诉讼程序规则第11条,可以制裁,并且建议撤销部分控告。海明在威慑之下,为逃避惩罚,签订了认罪书,与被告和解。但是后来主审法官认为海明不应被罚,而且允许桑兰在另外两项指控上修改状纸。我在当时即报道,桑兰案有三项无条件成活,另外三项修改状纸成活。我对桑兰案的19大预测,参见 http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_607d3a300102dyq6.html 。 2012年10月5日,桑兰向美国联邦法院发出动议,要求递交第四版修改起诉书(简称4AC)。下面,我主要介绍一下桑兰案最新状纸的新内容。 在4AC里,桑兰说当年受伤是因为运动会组织者TIME WARNER(时代华纳)管理不善导致场地混乱,桑兰正在高速冲刺跳马时,一罗马尼亚教练突然出现在着落区,将垫子挪动,导致桑兰受到干扰,腾空后未能正确着落,而是头部着地、颈椎断裂,关键神经遭到粉碎性损伤。而组织者为了逃避责任,隐瞒、销毁事故过程的录像。事故发生后,时代华纳坚称没有任何录像记录;而最新的证据表明,现场有多台摄像机拍摄。时代华纳甚至威胁一位拍摄了现场录像的卡特先生不得将录像泄露。这种刻意隐瞒导致桑兰失去了追究责任的证据。桑兰受伤的新闻公布后,引起美国社会的广泛同情,TIME WARNER在媒体上信誓旦旦地宣称要照顾桑兰及其家庭,这也导致桑兰没有去追究法律责任,但时至今日TIME WARNER却又拒绝兑现其承诺。因此,桑兰起诉TIME WARNER违背合同、背信弃义等等。 另外,桑兰指控:莫虎之前是她的律师,她多次向他提出法律咨询,莫虎为了利用她的名气也多次在媒体上自称为桑兰的律师;莫虎既是桑兰的律师,又是被告的律师,莫虎却没有告知桑兰可能的利益冲突;在很多事情方面(如桑兰基金管理),莫虎没有尽到其受托人的责任,导致桑兰基金账目不明。莫虎再次被推上了被告席。 针对KS LIU等人,桑兰的指控似乎得到了大大的强化。特别是诽谤与侵犯隐私方面的内容。大家可以参见4AC。状纸说桑兰的伤导致她从胸部以下完全瘫痪,大小便不能自理,小便如不及时排出就有尿毒危险;由于血液循环不善,下肢经常发青; 由于无法自主活动,肌肉萎缩,骨骼结构也变得松弛;每天晚上桑兰父母都得起来将桑兰身体翻个,以免长疮。由一个充满前途的、单纯的运动员,变成这样艰难的生存,桑兰挺过来了。但被告却说桑兰懒惰到大小便都不愿自己解,还说通过与中国政府官员的关系给桑兰介绍了工作,桑兰却因为懒而不愿干活,等等。桑兰认为,被告明知其伤情,却攻击她懒惰、贪婪、不知感恩,属于恶意诽谤,其造成的损害极为严重。我在之前曾分析,扭腰唐人街华人是进不了桑兰案陪审团的,如果把相关案情讲给美国人构成的陪审团听,他们肯定出离愤怒。桑兰是名人,其名誉的价值很难估算,全靠陪审团裁定。 桑兰还增加了侵吞其财产的指控,她说美国各界名人(如朱镕基、克林顿、里根、卡特、戈尔等政界人士以及众多歌星、影星、球星)送给她的礼物、纪念品等等都被被告侵吞了,她要要回来。 更为惊人的是,桑兰指控多名匿名人士利用SINOVISION网站对其进行诽谤、抹黑,而且这些人假冒被告的支持者,实为被告的打手,他们用恶毒、下流、贬低的语言对桑兰进行持续的人身攻击。桑兰直接点名的ID有“孙鹰”,“卓玛”与“毛茂”。据4AC称,被告与该网站的负责人经常会面,商讨网站运营事宜,其利用该网站攻击桑兰,实属阴谋。桑兰称,被告们的阴谋诽谤导致整个互联网充斥着对桑兰的贬损,给她及家人带来无穷的痛苦,给她的名誉带来极大的损害。为此,桑兰起诉30名匿名人士。我在之前曾分析,《 桑兰案追查匿名攻击者或许是一步好棋 》。现在看来,这也许是桑兰案的一个突破口。 这个4AC长达74页,有兴趣的可以参阅附件PDF。等我有时间,再做分析。 (未经本人书面许可,上文不得转载) 附件: 桑兰案起诉书第4版(4AC)下载(PDF)
16107 次阅读|43 个评论
分享 【八一征文】律师的社会问题
热度 9 岳东晓 2012-8-2 05:08
历史总是在重复、循环。。。法治社会最终还是依赖于人的素质。 让我们读读罗马帝国时代律师行当的历史吧。以下引自《罗马帝国衰亡史》中关于律师行业的描述。最后一段说: 律师们不顾名誉与正义,他们是无知而贪婪的向导,把他们的客户引入一个个费用、拖延与失望的迷宫,直到后者在数年诉讼之后,财力耗尽。 The profession of the law. All the civil magistrates were drawn from the profession of the law. The celebrated Institutes of Justinian are addressed to the youth of his dominions who had devoted themselves to the study of Roman jurisprudence; and the sovereign condescends to animate their diligence by the assurance that their skill and ability would in time be rewarded by an adequate share in the government of the republic. ( 120 ) The rudiments of this lucrative science were taught in all the considerable cities of the East and West; but the most famous school was that of Berytus, ( 121 ) on the coast of Phoenicia, which flourished above three centuries from the time of Alexander Severus, the author perhaps of an Institution so advantageous to his native country. After a regular course of education, which lasted five years, the students dispersed themselves through the provinces in search of fortune and honours; nor could they want an inexhaustible supply of business in a great empire already corrupted by the multiplicity of laws, of arts, and of vices. The court of the Praetorian praefect of the East could alone furnish employment for one hundred and fifty advocates, sixty-four of whom were distinguished by peculiar privileges, and two were annually chosen with a salary of sixty pounds of gold to defend the causes of the treasury. The first experiment was made of their judicial talents by appointing them to act occasionally as assessors to the magistrates; from thence they were often raised to preside in the tribunals before which they had pleaded. They obtained the government of a province; and, by the aid of merit, of reputation, or of favour, they ascended, by successive steps, to the illustrious dignities of the state. ( 122 ) In the practice of the bar these men had considered reason as the instrument of dispute; they interpreted the laws according to the dictates of private interest; and the same pernicious habits might still adhere to their characters in the public administration of the state. The honour of a liberal profession has indeed been vindicated by ancient and modern advocates, who have filled the most important stations with pure integrity and consummate wisdom; but in the decline of Roman jurisprudence the ordinary promotion of lawyers was pregnant with mischief and disgrace. The noble art, which had once been preserved as the sacred inheritance of the patricians, was fallen into the hands of freedmen and plebeians, ( 123 ) who, with cunning rather than with skill, exercised a sordid and pernicious trade . Some of them procured admittance into families for the purpose of fomenting differences, of encouraging suits, and of preparing a harvest of gain for themselves or their brethren. Others, recluse in their chambers, maintained the gravity of legal professors, by furnishing a rich client with subtleties to confound the plainest truth, and with arguments to colour the most unjustifiable pretensions. The splendid and popular class was composed of the advocates, who filled the Forum with the sound of their turgid and loquacious rhetoric. Careless of fame and of justice, they are described for the most part as ignorant and rapacious guides, who conducted their clients through a maze of expense, of delay, and of disappointment from whence, after a tedious series of years, they were at length dismissed, when their patience and fortune were almost exhausted . ( 124 )
12932 次阅读|17 个评论

Archiver|手机版|珍珠湾全球网

GMT+8, 2024-5-7 07:51 , Processed in 0.102881 second(s), 27 queries , Apc On.

Powered by Discuz! X2.5

回顶部