用户注册 登录
珍珠湾全球网 返回首页

岳东晓 -- 珍珠湾全球网 ... http://ydx.zzwave.com [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS] 岳东晓 -- 珍珠湾全球网

日志

刘龙珠律师诉周立波陷入僵局

热度 10已有 3829 次阅读2018-2-4 02:15 |个人分类:法律|系统分类:法律

几个月前在新闻里看到刘龙珠律师起诉周立波诽谤,之后没有什么动静。今天突然好奇,查了一下记录,发现双方早已经打了起来,而且法官好像要制裁刘律师。怎么回事呢?且待我看看。

2017年8月9日,原告向法院提交了 Proof of Service,也就是诉状送达的证明。之后,周立波雇佣了一名叫 CRAIG J. STEIN (斯坦恩) 的老牌律师,此人1981年就拿到律师执照。根据其网站,他打过一起长达14年的案子,迫使Church of Scientology赔偿了900万美金。案例为 Wollersheim v. Church of Scientology (1999)81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 896。
 

斯坦恩在2017年9月5日递交了一份撤诉动议,称传票送达无效而且法院对周立波没有人身管辖权。刘律师在9月25日递交了反对。斯坦恩在10月4日递交了一份 Anti-SLAPP 动议。所谓Anti-SLAPP,大家应该有印象。法院好像在10月6日就撤诉动议做出了裁决,但在案卷上看不到裁决内容。之后,斯坦恩律师递交了一个“裁决通知”,这似乎说明周立波在这个回合取得了胜利。因为根据加州民事诉讼程序,在动议中获胜的一方需要发一个“裁决通知。”参见: http://codes.findlaw.com/ca/code-of-civil-procedure/ccp-sect-1019-5.html  (When a motion is granted or denied, unless the court otherwise orders, notice of the court's decision or order shall be given by the prevailing party to all other parties or their attorneys)。之后,斯坦恩暂时取消了一个动议,似乎应该是那个 Anti-SLAPP 动议。而刘龙珠则递交了一个关于传票送达的宣誓证词。

目前该案的下一个听证是2018年2月7日,是法官发的一个 Order to Show Cause 。内容是因为原告未能在遵守加州法院规则 3.110(B), 将要制裁刘龙珠律师,要他说明为什么不必制裁。(AS TO WHY PLAINTIFF SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULE 3.110(B) CRC)。这条规则称原告应在起诉60天内送达传票。由此可以推断,周立波的律师在传票送达问题上打了一场胜仗,法院裁决传票未能有效送达。这才有斯坦恩取消后续动议的行动。结合周立波房子在卖的报道,刘律师起诉周立波似乎陷入了传票送达的僵局。周立波在美国似乎没有固定职业,如果再不知其住所,这就难了。

怎么办呢?

附件:
法院:Superior Court of California, Los Angeles
Case Number: EC066653LONG Z. LIU, AN INDIVIDUAL VS LIBO ZHOU, AN INDIVIDUALCase filed on 6/8/2017


Case Number:  EC066653
LONG Z. LIU, AN INDIVIDUAL VS LIBO ZHOU, AN INDIVIDUAL

Filing Courthouse:   Glendale Courthouse

Filing Date:  06/08/2017
Case Type:  Defamation (Slander/Libel) (General Jurisdiction)
Status:  Pending





FUTURE HEARINGS

02/07/2018 at 08:30 am in Department E at 600 East Broadway, Glendale, CA 91206
Order to Show Cause(AS TO WHY PLAINTIFF SHOULD NOT BESANCTIONED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLYWITH RULE 3.110(B) CRC)




PARTY INFORMATION

CRAIG J. STEIN - Attorney for Defendant

LIU LAW INC. - Attorney for Plaintiff

LIU LONG Z. - Plaintiff

ZHOU LIBO - Defendant




DOCUMENTS FILED

Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)

01/24/2018 Proof of Service
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

12/19/2017 Request (FOR COPIES -MINUTE ORDER AND DECLARATION - 4 PAGES )
Filed by Interested Party

12/08/2017 Declaration (ISO OSC RE SERVICE )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

11/20/2017 Notice (OF TAKING MOTION OFF CALENDAR WITHOUT PREJUDICE )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

10/13/2017 Notice of Ruling
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

10/12/2017 Notice (OF RESCHUDULING MOTION DATE )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

10/06/2017 Ord-Appt Apprv Rptr as Rptr protem
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

10/04/2017 Motion (SPECIAL APPEARANCE BY DEFENDANT LIBO ZHOU, AND SPECIAL MOTION STRIKE THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AS A MERITLESS SLAPP AND FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS)
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

10/04/2017 Notice (OF SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AS A MERITLESS SLAPP AND FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

09/29/2017 Objection (EVIDENTIARY OBJECTION TO THE DECLARATION OF LONG Z. LIU AND THE EXHIBITS TO THAT DECLARATION )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

09/29/2017 Reply (REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO SPECIAL APPEARANCE BY DEFENDANT )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

09/25/2017 Notice (OF LODGING: COMPENDIUM OF FEDERAL AUTHORITY SUBMITTED IN CONNECTION WITH PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO QUASH SERVICE )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

09/25/2017 Opposition (TO MOTION TO QUASH )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

09/05/2017 Notice of Lodging (COMPENDIUM OF FEDERAL AUTHORITY SUBMITTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

09/05/2017 Partial Dismissal (w/o Prejudice) (DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

09/05/2017 Notice of Motion (AND MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE AND DISMISS THE ACTION ON THE BASIS THAT THE COURT LACKS IN PERSONAM JURISDICTION OVER THE SPECIALLY APPEARING PARTY )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

09/01/2017 Request (REQUEST FOR COPIES FOR 56 PAGES. )
Filed by Interested Party

08/21/2017 Request (FOR 108 COPIES - ENTIRE FILE BY ATTORNEY SERVICE. )
Filed by Clerk

08/09/2017 Proof-Service/Summons
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

08/02/2017 First Amended Complaint
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

06/08/2017 Complaint filed-Summons Issued

06/08/2017 Summons Filed 


PROCEEDINGS HELD



Proceedings Held (Proceeding dates listed in descending order)

12/12/2017 at 08:30 am in Department NCGE, Laura A. Matz, Presiding
Order to Show Cause (REGARDING SERVICE) - Held-Continued

10/06/2017 at 08:30 am in Department NCGE, Laura A. Matz, Presiding
Motion (TO QUASH SERVICE AND DISMISS THEACTION ON THE BASIS THAT THE COURTLACKS IN PERSONAM JURISDICTIONOVER THE SPECIALLY APPEARINGPARTY) - Court makes Order

08/22/2017 at 08:30 am in Department NCGE, Laura A. Matz, Presiding
Order to Show Cause (RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH TRIALCOURT DELAY REDUCTION ACT) - OSC Discharged




REGISTER OF ACTIONS

Register of Actions (Listed in descending order)

01/24/2018 Proof of Service
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

12/19/2017 Request (FOR COPIES -MINUTE ORDER AND DECLARATION - 4 PAGES )
Filed by Interested Party

12/12/2017 at 08:30 am in Department NCGE, Laura A. Matz, Presiding
Order to Show Cause (REGARDING SERVICE) - Held-Continued

12/08/2017 Declaration (ISO OSC RE SERVICE )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

11/20/2017 Notice (OF TAKING MOTION OFF CALENDAR WITHOUT PREJUDICE )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

10/13/2017 Notice of Ruling
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

10/12/2017 Notice (OF RESCHUDULING MOTION DATE )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

10/06/2017 at 08:30 am in Department NCGE, Laura A. Matz, Presiding
Motion (TO QUASH SERVICE AND DISMISS THEACTION ON THE BASIS THAT THE COURTLACKS IN PERSONAM JURISDICTIONOVER THE SPECIALLY APPEARINGPARTY) - Court makes Order

10/06/2017 Ord-Appt Apprv Rptr as Rptr protem
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

10/04/2017 Motion (SPECIAL APPEARANCE BY DEFENDANT LIBO ZHOU, AND SPECIAL MOTION STRIKE THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AS A MERITLESS SLAPP AND FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS)
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

10/04/2017 Notice (OF SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AS A MERITLESS SLAPP AND FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

09/29/2017 Objection (EVIDENTIARY OBJECTION TO THE DECLARATION OF LONG Z. LIU AND THE EXHIBITS TO THAT DECLARATION )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

09/29/2017 Reply (REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO SPECIAL APPEARANCE BY DEFENDANT )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

09/25/2017 Notice (OF LODGING: COMPENDIUM OF FEDERAL AUTHORITY SUBMITTED IN CONNECTION WITH PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO QUASH SERVICE )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

09/25/2017 Opposition (TO MOTION TO QUASH )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

09/05/2017 Partial Dismissal (w/o Prejudice) (DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

09/05/2017 Notice of Lodging (COMPENDIUM OF FEDERAL AUTHORITY SUBMITTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

09/05/2017 Notice of Motion (AND MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE AND DISMISS THE ACTION ON THE BASIS THAT THE COURT LACKS IN PERSONAM JURISDICTION OVER THE SPECIALLY APPEARING PARTY )
Filed by Attorney for Defendant

09/01/2017 Request (REQUEST FOR COPIES FOR 56 PAGES. )
Filed by Interested Party

08/22/2017 at 08:30 am in Department NCGE, Laura A. Matz, Presiding
Order to Show Cause (RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH TRIALCOURT DELAY REDUCTION ACT) - OSC Discharged

08/21/2017 Request (FOR 108 COPIES - ENTIRE FILE BY ATTORNEY SERVICE. )
Filed by Clerk

08/09/2017 Proof-Service/Summons
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

08/02/2017 First Amended Complaint
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff

06/08/2017 Summons Filed

06/08/2017 Complaint filed-Summons Issued

2

路过

鸡蛋
8

鲜花

支持

雷人

难过

搞笑

刚表态过的朋友 (10 人)

 

发表评论 评论 (13 个评论)

回复 wx1wx2 2018-2-4 13:37
这位刘龙珠是不是来自台湾的那位论证章莹莹父母借女儿敛财 的那位律师啊?
回复 城市达人 2018-2-4 17:20
en ,学习学习,六点隐形,万一有用呢。
回复 wx1wx2 2018-2-5 21:21
程绍铭:从章莹颖案透视美国法律体制:有钱能使鬼推磨(图)
http://www.backchina.com/news/2018/02/05/542056.html
回复 岳东晓 2018-2-7 04:11
wx1wx2: 这位刘龙珠是不是来自台湾的那位论证章莹莹父母借女儿敛财 的那位律师啊?
有这种事?我查查
回复 wx1wx2 2018-2-7 04:20
岳东晓: 有这种事?我查查
刘龙珠律师法律评论:章莹颖家人狮子大开口要50万,涉嫌违法,可能坐牢20年! 文/刘龙
http://www.backchina.com/blog/359631/article-278518.html
回复 岳东晓 2018-2-7 04:22
wx1wx2: 刘龙珠律师法律评论:章莹颖家人狮子大开口要50万,涉嫌违法,可能坐牢20年! 文/刘龙
http://www.backchina.com/blog/359631/article-278518.html ...
一派胡言!
回复 wx1wx2 2018-2-7 04:41
岳东晓: 一派胡言!
绑架杀人者,至今未能定一点点罪、判一点点刑,受害者家人反而面临二十年的牢狱之灾……好可怕哟
回复 岳东晓 2018-2-12 00:20
wx1wx2: 绑架杀人者,至今未能定一点点罪、判一点点刑,受害者家人反而面临二十年的牢狱之灾……好可怕哟
我认为这个刘龙珠的【章莹颖的父母违反了美国法律,最高会面临20年的牢狱之灾】等言论已经构成相当严重的诽谤。
回复 wx1wx2 2018-2-12 01:16
它,当时引导并煽动起了一场腥风血雨般的围攻、羞辱、谩骂、驱赶运动,对章父母的伤害不亚于Brendt Christensen
回复 岳东晓 2018-2-12 04:38
wx1wx2: 它,当时引导并煽动起了一场腥风血雨般的围攻、羞辱、谩骂、驱赶运动,对章父母的伤害不亚于Brendt Christensen
章父母对此有何回应?
回复 wx1wx2 2018-2-12 13:47
章父本来想法是"活要见人死要见尸",没想到遭(华人律师为首的)同胞"伤口上撒盐"。面对"骗捐,敛财,想要绿卡,可能做牢20年 "等等,一家人接近崩溃,老太婆更是死去活来。只能回国去了。
回复 岳东晓 2018-2-13 00:47
wx1wx2: 章父本来想法是"活要见人死要见尸",没想到遭(华人律师为首的)同胞"伤口上撒盐"。面对"骗捐,敛财,想要绿卡,可能做牢20年 "等等 ...
刘龙珠造成恶劣伤害的证据在哪?
回复 wx1wx2 2018-2-13 11:50
网上

facelist

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 用户注册

Archiver|手机版|珍珠湾全球网

GMT+8, 2018-11-17 02:49 , Processed in 0.026172 second(s), 9 queries , Apc On.

Powered by Discuz! X2.5

回顶部